Results 111 to 120 of about 9,930 (284)

The Unintended Consequences of German Deterrence

open access: yesGlobal Policy, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Germany's evolving deterrence posture boils down to continued participation in NATO nuclear sharing and an ambitious conventional rearmament program. Due to its non‐nuclear status and a result of decades of underinvestment, Germany prioritizes modern conventional weapons.
Ulrich Kühn
wiley   +1 more source

The right to a constitutional complaint as an element of access to constitutional justice

open access: yesUzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law
The article is devoted to the study of the right to file a constitutional complaint as a component of ensuring access to constitutional justice. Based on the analysis of Ukraine’s legal doctrine and legislation, it has been established that the institution of constitutional complaint became a novelty within the framework of the institutional judicial ...
openaire   +3 more sources

Lady Anne Kerr: From the Rise of International Conference Interpreting to the Whitlam Dismissal

open access: yesAustralian Journal of Politics &History, EarlyView.
Before Anne Robson (née Taggart) became the second Lady Kerr upon marrying governor‐general John Kerr in 1975, she had an international career of some 30 years working as a French to English interpreter and consultant at over 30 national and international conferences and became the first Australian elected to the International Association of Conference
Alexis Bergantz
wiley   +1 more source

Social Justice in the Constitutional Complaint

open access: yes, 2019
One of the means of protecting the individual's liberties and rights is – in accordance with Art.79.1 of the Constitution of the Polish Republic of April 2, 1997 – the institution of common constitutional complaint.
Potrzeszcz, Jadwiga
core  

German Model of Communal Constitutional Complaint

open access: yes, 2020
Komunalna skarga konstytucyjna została przewidziana m.in. w Konstytucji Republi-ki Federalnej Niemiec. Jest to szczególny rodzaj skargi, funkcjonującej obok i nieza-leżnie od skargi konstytucyjnej w ogólnym rozumieniu.
Jagoda, Joanna
core  

INSTITUSIONALISASI CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT DALAM INSTRUMEN HUKUM DI INDONESIA DEMI MENJAMIN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BERDASARKAN PAHAM KONSTITUSIONALISME [PDF]

open access: yes, 2019
Indonesia merupakan negara hukum dan demokrasi yang berpaham konstitusionalisme. Salah satu ciri negara hukum adalah perlunya mekanisme perlindungan dan penegakkan hak konstitusional secara maksimal.
DINA MARIANA, 031511133114
core  

Strategic litigation as a challenge for deliberative democracy

open access: yesAmerican Journal of Political Science, EarlyView.
Abstract Strategic litigation is a growing public concern, but remains understudied in democratic theory. In strategic litigation, collectives go to court with a political agenda that goes beyond their specific case. How should we assess the legitimacy of strategic litigation? Building on Lafont's model of deliberative democracy and Klein's distinction
Svenja Ahlhaus
wiley   +1 more source

What is (de)politicization and what is wrong with it?

open access: yesAmerican Journal of Political Science, EarlyView.
Abstract This article attempts to clarify the meaning of (de)politicization. Politicization sometimes refers to the inappropriate intrusion of partisan loyalties in nonpolitical social domains (affective politicization). Politicization can also constitute an ideal of civic agency and energy (contestatory politicization).
Dimitrios Halikias
wiley   +1 more source

Should We Use Citizens' Assemblies to Make Health Policy?

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT This article assesses the normative case for using citizens' assemblies—small deliberative forums of randomly selected citizens—in health policymaking. Although they are increasingly popular, their normative justification remains underexplored. We reconstruct three possible rationales: Norman Daniels's ‘Accountability for Reasonableness’ (A4R)
Daniel Hutton Ferris, Johannes Kniess
wiley   +1 more source

Dealing With Conflicts in Medical Decisions: Epistemic Reasonable Disagreement Between Parents and Medical Staff

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Many controversies in medical ethics, particularly those involving conflicts between parents and medical staff over decisions about child patients, are challenging to manage without causing significant polarization and communication issues. This is primarily because the parties involved—parents and physicians—operate at different epistemic ...
Chiara Innorta
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy