Results 71 to 80 of about 8,626 (248)

The Timely Rise of a Teenage Reformer: Youth Revolt, Feminism and the Struggle for a ‘New Sexual Morality’ at the Dawn of the Spanish Second Republic

Gender &History, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT The contributions of propagandist and writer Hildegart (1914–1933) to Spanish cultural life are overshadowed by accounts of her unusual upbringing and violent death. This article examines the conditions that enabled the teenager to become a prominent voice for feminism and sexual reform on the eve of Spain's Second Republic (1931–1939).
Micaela Pattison
wiley   +1 more source

The right to a constitutional complaint as an element of access to constitutional justice

Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law
The article is devoted to the study of the right to file a constitutional complaint as a component of ensuring access to constitutional justice. Based on the analysis of Ukraine’s legal doctrine and legislation, it has been established that the institution of constitutional complaint became a novelty within the framework of the institutional judicial ...
openaire   +3 more sources

Patient Safety and Organisational Accountability: Reassessing Criminal Liability Frameworks in Healthcare

The Modern Law Review, EarlyView.
Serious harm in healthcare often results from systemic failures, yet criminal accountability remains largely addressed through homicide law, gross negligence manslaughter and health‐and‐safety offences, frameworks that emphasise individual culpability and are ill‐suited to addressing organisational failings.
Sarah Bennett, Amel Alghrani
wiley   +1 more source

CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT DAN CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION DAN PERLINDUNGAN HAK-HAK KONSTITUSIONAL WARGA NEGARA

Jurnal Media Hukum, 2012
The 1945 Constitution gives limitative authority to the Constitutional Court only to review of laws against the constitution, adjudicate dispute over state institution whose authorities are mandate by constitution, adjudicate dispute on the result of ...
Hamdan Zoelva
doaj  

Integration Through Rights: Towards an Associational Paradigm

The Modern Law Review, EarlyView.
Integration policies in the EU and the UK have over the past two decades increasingly emphasised duties and constraints for migrants. This article challenges the duty‐based model and proposes an alternative legal conception: ‘integration through rights’, with associational rights taking a central role.
Sarah Ganty, Clíodhna Murphy
wiley   +1 more source

Constitutional Complaint Dalam Rangka Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia di Republik Indonesia

Jurnal Media Hukum, 2016
The Constitutional Court exists to oversee the RI State Constitution contained therein and the protection of human rights enforcement. Protection of constitutional rights of citizens by the Court comes through constitutional review authority.
Solidaman Bertho Plaituka
doaj  

Evaluation and assessment of the constitutionality of penitentiary decisions, in the light of the introduction of the penitentiary credit system

Belügyi Szemle
Aim: Criteria for the evaluation by the Constitutional Court of decisions on the execution of sentences. Methodology: Descriptive, documentary and content analysis.
Ágnes Czine
doaj   +1 more source

The limits of the constitutional court control over the judicial authority: Some open questions [PDF]

Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu, 2019
In most states that have a centralized system of constitutional control, there is tension in the relations between the Constitutional Court and ordinary courts. The fundamental question raised in this regard is weather the Constitutional Court, acting on
Rajić Nataša
doaj  

Effects of the Rulings of Constitutional Court in Time

Teisė, 2019
The article analyzes the temporal effects of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania’s rulings, i.e., ex tunc, ex nunc, and pro futuro elements of judicial decisions in the constitutional justice model of Lithuania.
Dovilė Pūraitė-Andrikienė
doaj   +1 more source

X v The Lord Advocate: Challenges and Concerns for Vicarious Liability

The Modern Law Review, EarlyView.
In X v The Lord Advocate, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the Crown cannot be vicariously liable for torts committed by judges. This case note critically examines what could be viewed as two significant doctrinal shifts that were introduced by this ruling.
Haim Abraham
wiley   +1 more source