Results 211 to 220 of about 893 (257)

Should We Use Citizens' Assemblies to Make Health Policy?

Bioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT This article assesses the normative case for using citizens' assemblies—small deliberative forums of randomly selected citizens—in health policymaking. Although they are increasingly popular, their normative justification remains underexplored. We reconstruct three possible rationales: Norman Daniels's ‘Accountability for Reasonableness’ (A4R)
Daniel Hutton Ferris, Johannes Kniess
wiley   +1 more source

Dealing With Conflicts in Medical Decisions: Epistemic Reasonable Disagreement Between Parents and Medical Staff

Bioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Many controversies in medical ethics, particularly those involving conflicts between parents and medical staff over decisions about child patients, are challenging to manage without causing significant polarization and communication issues. This is primarily because the parties involved—parents and physicians—operate at different epistemic ...
Chiara Innorta
wiley   +1 more source

Bacteriological research and 'puerperal' fever: female health and childbirth in late colonial India. [PDF]

Med Hist
Bajpayee K.
europepmc   +1 more source

Christianity and reverential naturalism engage a world in peril: A dialogue between disciplines. [PDF]

Soc Compass
Bramadat P, Thatamanil J.
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty

European Law Journal, 2005
Abstract:  One of the core constitutional questions for national constitutional courts in the EU in the past decades has been whether to accept the claim made by the Court of Justice that EU law is the supreme law of the land, taking primacy even over conflicting national constitutional provisions.
Mattias Kumm
exaly   +2 more sources

Constitutional Islamization and Islamic Supremacy Clauses

2023
Muhammad Zubair Abbasi
exaly   +2 more sources

The Myths of Legislative and Constitutional Supremacy

1989
exaly   +2 more sources

3 Judicial Supremacy and Constitutional Distortion

2002
exaly   +2 more sources

Constitutional Dialogue and Judicial Supremacy

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
This paper analyzes constitutional dialogue by comparing a constitutional system that (almost) entrenches judicial supremacy - the United States - with a constitutional system that seeks to reconcile a judicial and legislative role in constitutional interpretation - Canada. The argument has three parts.
openaire   +1 more source