Results 221 to 230 of about 210,017 (262)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Constructive Empiricism and the Vices of Voluntarism
International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2009Abstract Constructive empiricism – as formulated by Bas van Fraassen – makes no epistemological claims about the nature of science. Rather, it is a view about the aim of science, to be situated within van Fraassen’s broader voluntarist epistemology. Yet while this epistemically minimalist framework may have various advantages in defending the epistemic
exaly +2 more sources
Bayesian Agnosticism and Constructive Empiricism
Analysis, 19981. How should the traditional doxastic attitude of agnosticism be represented in a Bayesian framework? In Laws and Symmetry, Bas van Fraassen proposes that agnosticism be represented as having a certain type of vague opinion. A Bayesian with no vague opinions assigns sharp subjective probabilities to all propositions in a domain of discourse.
Bradley Monton
exaly +4 more sources
van Fraassen’s Constructive Empiricism
An introductory discussion of constructive ...
Sankey, Howard
core +5 more sources
Defending constructive empiricism [PDF]
Bas van Fraassen’s constructive empiricism has significantly shaped the debate on scientific realism. However, many commentators have been puzzled by the precise nature of the argument for this position. This paper reconstructs that argument.
Van Dyck, Maarten
core +6 more sources
Constructive Empiricism and Modal Nominalism
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2003James Ladyman has argued that constructive empiricism entails modal realism, and that this renders constructive empiricism untenable. We maintain that constructive empiricism is compatible with modal nominalism. Although the central term ‘observable’ has been analyzed in terms of counterfactuals, and in general counterfactuals do not have objective ...
Monton, Bradley, van Fraassen, Bas C.
openaire +1 more source
Empiricism, Theoretical Constructs and God
The Journal of Religion, 1974Empiricism in religion has not had its final hearing. There is a ‘Quinean move’, and ‘interpretative move’ and what I shall label a kind of ‘naive empiricism’ that still needs to be heard. I shall start with ‘naive empiricism’ first and then proceed to the other two moves.
openaire +1 more source
On an Inconsistency in Constructive Empiricism
Philosophy of Science, 1997I show that van Fraassen's empiricism leads to mutually incompatible claims with regard to empirical theories. He is committed to the claim that reasons for accepting a theory and believing it are always identical, insofar as the theory in question is an empirical theory.
openaire +1 more source
Radical empiricism is not constructive
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1997The radical empiricist theory of the Quartz & Sejnowski target article would result in a brain that could not act. The attempt to bolster this position with computational arguments is misleading and often just wrong. Fortunately, other efforts are making progress in linking neural and cognitive development.
openaire +1 more source

