Results 221 to 230 of about 229,746 (260)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
The “Positive Argument” for Constructive Empiricism and Inference to the Best Explanation [PDF]
In this paper, I argue that the “positive argument” for Constructive Empiricism (CE), according to which CE “makes better sense of science, and of scientific activity, than realism does” (van Fraassen 1980, 73), is an Inference to the Best Explanation ...
Moti Mizrahi
exaly +3 more sources
Empiricism, Theoretical Constructs and God
The Journal of Religion, 1974Empiricism in religion has not had its final hearing. There is a ‘Quinean move’, and ‘interpretative move’ and what I shall label a kind of ‘naive empiricism’ that still needs to be heard. I shall start with ‘naive empiricism’ first and then proceed to the other two moves.
openaire +1 more source
Radical empiricism is not constructive
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1997The radical empiricist theory of the Quartz & Sejnowski target article would result in a brain that could not act. The attempt to bolster this position with computational arguments is misleading and often just wrong. Fortunately, other efforts are making progress in linking neural and cognitive development.
openaire +1 more source
On an Inconsistency in Constructive Empiricism
Philosophy of Science, 1997I show that van Fraassen's empiricism leads to mutually incompatible claims with regard to empirical theories. He is committed to the claim that reasons for accepting a theory and believing it are always identical, insofar as the theory in question is an empirical theory.
openaire +1 more source
The Epistemology of Constructive Empiricism
2007Abstract This chapter questions what epistemic reason van Fraassen has for focusing on empirical adequacy. It contrasts van Fraassen's constructive empiricism with a pragmatic empiricism, where one gives pragmatic, not epistemic, reasons for believing in the claims of a theory.
openaire +1 more source
A Biological Objection to Constructive Empiricism
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1993Dans « The Scientific Image » (1980), Van Fraassen developpe ce que les AA. denomment la doctrine du rejet de la these non observable.
CHARLES CHIHARA, CAROL CHIHARA
openaire +1 more source

