Results 201 to 210 of about 87,653 (311)
This study identified multiple areas for improvement in the regulatory risk assessment process. Conclusions based on predictive sensitization data should be made with caution, read‐across data from known sensitizers should be utilized, and epidemiological and patient threshold data should be prioritized in decision‐making.
Mathias Krogh Pedersen +7 more
wiley +1 more source
Genetic Insights Into Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Reassessing the Role of LCE3C_LCE3B Deletion. [PDF]
Ben Lamine Z +10 more
europepmc +1 more source
Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Immunopathology and Potential Therapeutic Strategies. [PDF]
Funch AB, Geisler C, Bonefeld CM.
europepmc +1 more source
MCI/MI and MI contact allergy remain persistent. In this analysis of the Danish market, 257 products containing MCI/MI or MI were identified, and 30 products were analysed. Two exceeded regulatory limits, while most complied, suggesting current limits may require further investigation. Created in BioRender. Pedersen, M. K.
Mathias Krogh Pedersen +9 more
wiley +1 more source
Psychopathological Burden in Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Results From a Case-Control Study Using the SCL-90-R. [PDF]
Navarro-Triviño FJ +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
ABSTRACT Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are common in children and are diagnostically challenging, with cutaneous manifestations being the most common presentation. Patch testing (PT) is a well‐established tool for investigating delayed T‐cell‐mediated reactions and is widely used in patients with contact dermatitis.
Gabriele Simonetti +7 more
wiley +1 more source
Allergic Contact Dermatitis of the Vulva. [PDF]
Blom T +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Virtual Reality Headset as a Cause of Allergic Contact Dermatitis in a Child. [PDF]
Eid D, Akhtar S, Stone N.
europepmc +1 more source
Patch Test Reactions to Dental Materials: A Retrospective Single‐Centre Study
In this retrospective single‐centre study of 439 adults referred for suspected delayed‐type hypersensitivity to dental materials, 50.1% had at least one positive patch test reaction, most often to metals. Nickel (23.0%) and palladium (16.6%) pre‐dominated, whilst methacrylate positivity was uncommon (6.2%) and not fully captured by HEMA alone.
Mojca Bizjak‐Suran +3 more
wiley +1 more source

