Results 151 to 160 of about 5,345,928 (211)
Demonstratives as attention tools: Evidence of mentalistic representations within language. [PDF]
Jara-Ettinger J, Rubio-Fernandez P.
europepmc +1 more source
Conventional Implicatures in Computational Argumentation
Hautli-Janisz, Annette +4 more
openaire +1 more source
Emergence of a synergistic scaffold in the brains of human infants. [PDF]
Varley TF +7 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
The Myth of Conventional Implicature
Linguistics and Philosophy, 1999Depuis la distinction que fit Grice entre le dit et l'implicature, on considere generalement que le premier est du ressort de la semantique, tandis que le second appartient au domaine de la pragmatique. Cependant, dans cette distinction, l'implicature conventionnelle pose probleme, derivant plutot du sens d'expressions particulieres que des ...
Kent Bach
exaly +3 more sources
Conventional Implicature and Presupposition [PDF]
グライス(1989)は発話の意味を「言ったこと」と含意とに区別し、後者を更に、会話の含意と慣用 的含意とに区別した。会話の含意は協調の原理をもとに、また慣用的含意は語彙的要素や構文をもとに 生成される。これとは独立して、ストローソン(1950/2013)によって、断定と対照される概念として前 提の概念が紹介された。前提は、語彙的要素や構文をもとに生成されるものと、会話的要素をもとに生 成されるものとがある。そこで問題となるのが、含意と前提の関係である。文献ではこの問題について ...
Sandrine Zufferey +2 more
semanticscholar +4 more sources
II—Conventional Implicature, Presupposition, and Lying
Introduction. Most philosophers agree that lies are assertions.1 In particular, most agree that you lie only if you assert something you believe to be false.2 You can avoid lying if you can avoid asserting disbelieved information.
Andreas Stokke
exaly +3 more sources
Enriched Meanings, 2020
This chapter presents a monadic analysis of conventional implicatures. These expressions are compositionally challenging and also seem to challenge the traditional semantics/pragmatics divide by straddling it. This chapter first introduces two main sorts of conventional implicature, appositives and expressives.
Ash Asudeh, Gianluca Giorgolo
openaire +2 more sources
This chapter presents a monadic analysis of conventional implicatures. These expressions are compositionally challenging and also seem to challenge the traditional semantics/pragmatics divide by straddling it. This chapter first introduces two main sorts of conventional implicature, appositives and expressives.
Ash Asudeh, Gianluca Giorgolo
openaire +2 more sources
Into the Conventional‐Implicature Dimension
Philosophy Compass, 2007Abstract Grice coined the term ‘conventional implicature’ in a short passage in ‘Logic and Conversation’. The description is intuitive and deeply intriguing. The range of phenomena that have since been assigned this label is large and diverse. I survey the central factual motivation, arguing that it is loosely unified by the idea that
Christopher Potts
openaire +2 more sources
Conventional implicature revisited
Journal of Pragmatics, 2008Abstract I suggest a new approach to terms famous for introducing conventional implicatures, “even”, “but”, and so on. I call these expressions View on Content Devices or VCDs. First, I focus on the nature of VCD's semantic contribution to sentences.
exaly +2 more sources

