Results 321 to 330 of about 339,133 (356)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
The Convergent Validity of Two Burnout Instruments
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2003Summary This study examined the factorial and convergent validity of the OLdenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) and the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MBI-GS) among 232 Greek employees from different occupational groups (e. g., banking and insurance, chemical industry).
Evangelia Demerouti +4 more
openaire +1 more source
Evaluation of the convergent validity of Young's questionnaires
L'EncéphaleYoung's schema therapy is based on two questionnaires: the Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ) and the Schema Mode Inventory (SMI). The YSQ describes 18 early maladaptive schemas (EMSs), and the French-language version of the YSQ has been validated. The SMI is based on 14 schema modes representing the set of EMSs that are active at a given time and that ...
Martine Bouvard +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Convergent Validation of the Recursive Trinity
This release presents a landmark mathematical discovery: two fully independent frameworks — Recursive Trinity and Prime Calculus — converge with extraordinary precision on the same emergent constants and conceptual structures, confirming the recursive nature of π, φ, and e.openaire +1 more source
Predictive validity in drug discovery: what it is, why it matters and how to improve it
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2022, John Hickman, Gerard Dawson
exaly
An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity
Organizational Research Methods, 2022Mikko Rönkkö, Eunseong Cho
exaly
2014
The first aim of this study is to present a revised version of the Collaborative Interactions Scales. The most important changes are: faster scoring, reduction of scoring categories and introduction of new and more specific markers to rate patient collaboration. The second aim is to present data about validity and reliability. The sample consists of 80
Condino, V. +3 more
openaire +1 more source
The first aim of this study is to present a revised version of the Collaborative Interactions Scales. The most important changes are: faster scoring, reduction of scoring categories and introduction of new and more specific markers to rate patient collaboration. The second aim is to present data about validity and reliability. The sample consists of 80
Condino, V. +3 more
openaire +1 more source

