Results 41 to 50 of about 2,355 (180)

Just collateral damage? Accountability of economic elites in peacebuilding and transitional justice in Colombia

open access: yesPeace &Change, Volume 49, Issue 3, Page 223-241, July 2024.
Abstract Analyzing how transitional justice (TJ) mechanisms address the role of economic and political elites in contexts of widespread violence is crucial for understanding their possible transformative impact. The type of challenges faced by TJ instruments when trying to deal with economic elites involved in human rights violations also reflects the ...
Rosario Figari Layús
wiley   +1 more source

The conflict between Rights of Nature and mining in Ecuador: Implications of the Los Cedros Cloud Forest case for biodiversity conservation

open access: yesPeople and Nature, Volume 6, Issue 3, Page 1096-1115, June 2024.
Abstract Global emergence of Rights of Nature (RoN) has gained momentum since Ecuador became the first country to constitutionally recognize it in 2008. The shift from perceiving nature as an object, to granting it legal subjecthood, can revolutionize protection of ecological systems.
M. R. Peck   +4 more
wiley   +1 more source

La igualdad en la Jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional

open access: yesPensamiento Jurídico, 1996
La igualdad en la Jurisprudencia de la Corte ...
Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
doaj  

Investment projects and the protection of indigenous peoples and territories in Colombia

open access: yesLatin American Policy, Volume 15, Issue 2, Page 288-319, June 2024.
Abstract This article addresses the protection of indigenous peoples and their natural habitats in Colombia when investment projects are planned or implemented. Special attention is paid to the mechanisms of prior informed consultation; and free, prior, and informed consent. The Colombian case is relevant because it is at the vanguard of protecting the
Liliana Lizarazo‐Rodríguez   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Minimalismo judicial: ¿Cass Sunstein en la Corte Constitucional?

open access: yesCuestiones Constitucionales Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional, 2009
Cass Sustein Unstein es hoy en día uno de los principales expositores de la tesis del minimalismo judicial, metodología de adjudicación que puede ser utilizada por el máximo órgano de control constitucional cuando interpreta la Constitución. En este artículo se exponen las principales características y ventajas de esta metodología, así como una ...
openaire   +7 more sources

From Vicious to Virtuous Cycles: A Conceptual Framework on (De‐)Marginalisation and Citizen Security in Colombia

open access: yesBulletin of Latin American Research, Volume 43, Issue 1, Page 18-31, January 2024.
Since the 2016 Havana Peace Accord (HPA), for many Colombians security has hardly improved. This article argues that this is largely due to socially rooted marginalisation that constrains citizen participation and contributes to entrenched insecurity in the country, especially its border regions.
Dáire McGill   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

La desnaturalización de la acción extraordinaria de protección en la práctica judicial ecuatoriana

open access: yesIustitia Socialis, 2020
Se  analizan los principales criterios jurisprudenciales emitidos por la Corte Constitucional referente a la acción extraordinaria de protección (AEP).  El  objetivo trazado es revisar los criterios jurisprudenciales de la Corte Constitucional que eviten
Jhony Valentín Zhindón Idrovo   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Perspectiva constitucional colombiana de la Comunidad Andina: la jurisprudencia constitucional del Acuerdo de Cartagena

open access: yesRevista IUSTA, 2016
El presente escrito busca describir el entendimiento de la jurisprudencia constitucional del proceso de integración andino. Para ello, se revisarán los fallos de la Corte Constitucional, a fin de determinar los criterios constitucionales que permanecen ...
JORGE RICARDO PALOMARES G.
doaj   +1 more source

Corte Constitucional Colombiana y casos trágicos

open access: yes, 2019
In this book the tragic case is characterized as a problem that only emerges with post-positivism or neo-constitutionalism; and from the standard theory of legal argumentation, which identifies it as a limit to legal rationality in that the collision of principles in which it arises cannot be resolved under the aegis of proportionality weighting, three
Mauricio Enrique Rodríguez Delgado   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy