Results 241 to 250 of about 385,645 (329)
Extracting vitalities: Cuts in Indigenous women's bodies‐territories (Brazil)
Abstract In this article, I explore the connections between the medicalization of childbirth and environmental devastation through Guarani‐Mbyá understandings of life and the living. I argue that the cuts made to Guarani‐Mbyá women's vaginas (episiotomies) in Brazilian hospitals are experienced and situated on the same cosmopolitical level as the cuts ...
Maria Paula Prates
wiley +1 more source
Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements. [PDF]
Gu G +59 more
europepmc +1 more source
Abstract This essay, designed as a complement to opinions expressed by Rowan Williams and some speakers at the conference in his honour, explores features of early Christianity which suggest a positive evaluation of artificial intelligence. Noting that the fear of reducing humans to machines has been joined in the modern age by the fear that machines ...
Mark J. Edwards
wiley +1 more source
Manifesto: challenging the standard cosmological model. [PDF]
Binney J +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Bounding Horizon-Activated Effects in Möbius Cosmology with Existing and Near-Term Data
Eric Mize
openalex +1 more source
Theologies of Mind: Eriugena and Pratyabhijñā Śaivism
Abstract Though Eriugena's affinities with several Hindu traditions are clear, this article offers to my knowledge the first detailed discussion of Eriugena's theology in relation to any Indic theological school, here, the nondualist Śaiva tradition known as the Pratyabhijñā (“Recognition”) lineage.
Matthew Z. Vale
wiley +1 more source
Universal Critical Mass for Quantum Collapse ( Mc ): A Cosmological Limit to Unitarity
Douglas H. M. FULBER
openalex +1 more source
Oscillating gravitational potential in cosmological scalar field perturbation. [PDF]
Jai-chan Hwang, Hyerim Noh
openalex
The Analogia Entis for Reformed Theology: Retrieving Calvin's Implicit Metaphysics
Abstract The famous controversy between Emil Brunner and Karl Barth which led to Barth's ‘No!’ was driven by disagreements over how to read John Calvin: Barth and Brunner never agreed on whether Calvin had a doctrine of the analogy of being. This article rekindles the debate.
Silvianne Aspray
wiley +1 more source

