Results 191 to 200 of about 1,266,762 (228)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2018
The Nordic courts and court culture have several distinctive traits: (1) a three-tier court hierarchy with little specialisation; (2) judicial discretion and pragmatism; (3) “Nordic” oral proceedings; (4) lay participation; and (5) the role of Supreme Courts and the doctrine of quasi-stare decisis.
Anna Nylund, Jørn Øyrehagen Sunde
openaire +1 more source
The Nordic courts and court culture have several distinctive traits: (1) a three-tier court hierarchy with little specialisation; (2) judicial discretion and pragmatism; (3) “Nordic” oral proceedings; (4) lay participation; and (5) the role of Supreme Courts and the doctrine of quasi-stare decisis.
Anna Nylund, Jørn Øyrehagen Sunde
openaire +1 more source
American Journal of International Law, 1998
Leave aside the question whether the indication of provisional measures by the International Court of Justice in the Breard case was binding on the United States as a matter of international or domestic law. Scholars will continue to differ on this question; government decision makers will reach their own conclusions.
openaire +1 more source
Leave aside the question whether the indication of provisional measures by the International Court of Justice in the Breard case was binding on the United States as a matter of international or domestic law. Scholars will continue to differ on this question; government decision makers will reach their own conclusions.
openaire +1 more source
Modernizing Courts or Courting Modernization?
Criminal Justice, 2000The article reviews the way in which the government-led public service modernisation agenda is affecting courts in England and Wales. The pros and cons associated with each of seven tenets of modernisation are explored and the article then argues for a modernisation programme for the courts that better reflects their distinctive circumstances and ...
openaire +1 more source
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2013
Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being offered in court cases. Consequently, the legal system needs neuroscientists to act as expert witnesses who can explain the limitations and interpretations of neuroscientific findings so that judges and jurors can make informed and appropriate inferences.
Jones, Owen D. +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being offered in court cases. Consequently, the legal system needs neuroscientists to act as expert witnesses who can explain the limitations and interpretations of neuroscientific findings so that judges and jurors can make informed and appropriate inferences.
Jones, Owen D. +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
The Court of Strasbourg Acting as an Asylum Court
European Constitutional Law Review, 2012Article 3 ECHR and expulsion, extradition – Indirect and potential violations – Interim measures – Lowering of threshold – Transformation from civil to social right – Asylum seekers special vulnerable ...
openaire +2 more sources
The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 1992
This article was written in May 1992, after Magic Johnson announced he had tested positive for the human immunodeficiency virus that causes AIDS and was retiring from the Los Angeles Lakers. Since then, Johnson played in the 1992 Summer Olympic Games and, after a brief return to the Lakers, permanently retired from the NBA.
openaire +2 more sources
This article was written in May 1992, after Magic Johnson announced he had tested positive for the human immunodeficiency virus that causes AIDS and was retiring from the Los Angeles Lakers. Since then, Johnson played in the 1992 Summer Olympic Games and, after a brief return to the Lakers, permanently retired from the NBA.
openaire +2 more sources
The Courts: New Court Management and Old Court Ideologies
2001Ben Fitzpatrick +3 more
openaire +1 more source