Results 231 to 240 of about 885,675 (316)
Perspectives on collaboration between drug courts and MOUD providers: Impact of interagency implementation strategies. [PDF]
Pivovarova E +7 more
europepmc +1 more source
Five Decades of Research on Rape Myths and Victim Interpretation
ABSTRACT Over the past 5 decades of social science research, scholars have examined false narratives and beliefs associated with rape and sexual assault (often called “rape myths”). This scoping review employs an innovative technique to sample and describe a large cohort of scholarly articles that investigate sexual assault victim interpretation and ...
Elizabeth Trudeau, Ruth Carmi
wiley +1 more source
Justice, Disability, and Law: A Neurological and Ethical Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis in Turkey. [PDF]
Yılmaz F +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
ABSTRACT This is a retrospective case study of an antisemitic lone actor terrorist who completed the deadliest attack against the Jewish community in American history. The analysis through the lens of the Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol (TRAP‐18) finds that 72% of the warning indicators were present, including four proximal warning ...
Molly Amman, Julia Kupper, J. Reid Meloy
wiley +1 more source
Medicolegal Aspects of Neurosurgery in India: A Narrative Review. [PDF]
Sathia Prabhu A +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Cognitive Decline on the Bench: A Text Analysis of the Opinions of Justice Stephen Field
ABSTRACT This paper uses text analysis to understand how cognitive decline affected the opinion writing of Justice Stephen Field over the course of his career. Justice Field is used as a case study because of his lengthy tenure, the fact he did not have law clerks to write opinions for him, and because it is widely known he was senile for the last part
Mikel A. Norris
wiley +1 more source
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Factors Affecting Motivation to Undergo Vasectomy: Does the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision Matter? [PDF]
Spinaris R +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Applying the Rules of Evidence to Expert Testimony About Risk
ABSTRACT Expert opinion about dangerousness or risk is common at sentencing, criminal commitment proceedings and some types of pretrial detention hearings. This article argues that such evidence must be (1) “material” (logically relevant, empirically generalizable, and epistemologically germane), (2) “probative” (a measure of accuracy, which is ...
Christopher Slobogin
wiley +1 more source

