Results 271 to 280 of about 885,675 (316)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Court to Court

American Journal of International Law, 1998
Leave aside the question whether the indication of provisional measures by the International Court of Justice in the Breard case was binding on the United States as a matter of international or domestic law. Scholars will continue to differ on this question; government decision makers will reach their own conclusions.
openaire   +1 more source

Modernizing Courts or Courting Modernization?

Criminal Justice, 2000
The article reviews the way in which the government-led public service modernisation agenda is affecting courts in England and Wales. The pros and cons associated with each of seven tenets of modernisation are explored and the article then argues for a modernisation programme for the courts that better reflects their distinctive circumstances and ...
openaire   +1 more source

Courts and Court Proceedings

2018
The Nordic courts and court culture have several distinctive traits: (1) a three-tier court hierarchy with little specialisation; (2) judicial discretion and pragmatism; (3) “Nordic” oral proceedings; (4) lay participation; and (5) the role of Supreme Courts and the doctrine of quasi-stare decisis.
Anna Nylund, Jørn Øyrehagen Sunde
openaire   +1 more source

The Court of Strasbourg Acting as an Asylum Court

European Constitutional Law Review, 2012
Article 3 ECHR and expulsion, extradition – Indirect and potential violations – Interim measures – Lowering of threshold – Transformation from civil to social right – Asylum seekers special vulnerable ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Science in court

BMJ, 2009
Does English libel law threaten scientific debate in health care? Professor Sir Muir Gray, in his book Evidence-based Healthcare 1 tells the old joke about the epidemiologist up in court on a serious charge. “How do you plead? Guilty or not guilty?” asks the judge. “I don’t know: I haven’t heard the evidence yet.” Recent events bring comedy, evidence,
openaire   +2 more sources

The Courts and Euthanasia

Law, Medicine and Health Care, 1987
Most of us, I think, supposed that the debate over euthanasia (doing something to end a life that could otherwise continue) had been pretty well settled. For a long time a minority favored it and a majority opposed it—at least in principle, although not always in practice.
openaire   +2 more sources

A decade-long longitudinal survey shows that the Supreme Court is now much more conservative than the public

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022
Stephen A Jessee   +2 more
exaly  

COURT, COURT

AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 1958
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy