Judicial Interpretation of State Ethics Rules Under the McDade Amendment: Do Federal or State Courts Get the Last Word? [PDF]
The McDade Amendment ( the Act ) is a federal law that requires federal prosecutors to abide by the state ethics rules of the jurisdiction in which they practice. The Act does not say, however, whether federal or state courts are definitive when it comes
Costello, Hopi
core +1 more source
Feared, revered, and politicized, wolves have long captured human imagination, and ignited fierce conservation conflicts. In the United States, the Endangered Species Act protects species at risk of extinction from human impacts. This far‐reaching legislation, which impacts development and state‐level wildlife management, has been fraught with legal ...
Iree Wheeler +9 more
wiley +1 more source
The Trojan Horse: How the Declaratory Judgment Act Created a Cause of Action and Expanded Federal Jurisdiction While the Supreme Court Wasn\u27t Looking [PDF]
This Article examines the Court\u27s treatment of declaratory judgment actions. It demonstrates that the Court\u27s ‘procedural only’ view of the Act frustrates congressional intent and is neither analytically sound nor practical.
Doernberg, Donald L. +1 more
core +1 more source
Abstract Remarkably little is known about what factors drive success or failure in foreign policy. In part, this is because there is little fundamental agreement on what constitutes success or failure in this domain in the first place. This article engages with these shortcomings by comparing two similar regional order‐building initiatives overseen by ...
Benjamin Day
wiley +1 more source
Martinez Guzman v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev. Adv. Op. 12 (Mar. 26, 2020)
The Court clarified the ambiguity of the meaning “territorial jurisdiction,” a term of art found in NRS 172.105. The Court held that NRS 172.105 incorporates Nevada’s venue statutes and grants a grand jury the authority to “inquire into a [criminal ...
McCormick-Huhn, John
core
History Comes Calling: Dean Griswold Offers New Evidence About the Jurisdictional Debate Surrounding the Enactment of the Declaratory Judgment Act [PDF]
In a recent article, we proposed that the Declaratory Judgment Act of 1934 was intended, contrary to the Supreme Court\u27s long-standing interpretation, to enlarge the subject matter jurisdiction of the federal courts.
Doernberg, Donald L. +1 more
core +1 more source
Papua New Guinea's Public Services Commission since independence: Sidelined or strengthened?
Abstract This paper investigates reforms to the Public Services Commission (PSC) in Papua New Guinea (PNG) since independence in 1975. It looks at the original role of the PSC and then the various reforms it has been subject to: in 1986, 2003, and 2013, by constitutional and legislative change, and in 2019, by court ruling.
Nematullah Bizhan, Stephen Howes
wiley +1 more source
Means to combat tax evasion in the European Union [PDF]
Invoking the law in an abusive manner can aim to avoid the provisions of national law rather than illegitimate gains or wholly contrary to EU legislation.
Alia Gabriela DUTA
core
Unsigning the Rome Statute: Examining the Relationship Between the United States and the International Criminal Court [PDF]
Presently, 120 states are parties to the Rome Statute establishing the International Criminal Court (ICC). A state that one will not find on the list, however, would be the United States.
Naylor, Allison
core +1 more source
The Multilevel Implications of a Sinn Féin Government in Ireland
Abstract The electoral growth of Sinn Féin on both sides of the Irish border has generated much political and academic attention in recent years. The party could form part of the government in Dublin for the first time at the next Irish general election, though that outcome is far from certain.
Conor J. Kelly
wiley +1 more source

