Results 51 to 60 of about 36,393 (302)
Applying the Rules of Evidence to Expert Testimony About Risk
Behavioral Sciences &the Law, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Expert opinion about dangerousness or risk is common at sentencing, criminal commitment proceedings and some types of pretrial detention hearings. This article argues that such evidence must be (1) “material” (logically relevant, empirically generalizable, and epistemologically germane), (2) “probative” (a measure of accuracy, which is ...
Christopher Slobogin
wiley +1 more source
From Custom to Court: The Evolution of Mediation in European Legal Systems
Conflict Resolution Quarterly, EarlyView.ABSTRACT This article traces how European mediation has repeatedly rebalanced three variables—(1) the source of mediator authority, (2) the degree of institutionalization, and (3) the operative meaning of voluntariness—from antiquity to the present. Using three periods—Proto‐Mediation (c. 500 BCE–c. 1750), Classical Mediation (c.
Viktoriia Hamaiunova
wiley +1 more source
Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 2012 In Al-Skeini v the United Kingdom, the European Court on Human Rights clarified the scope ratione loci of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Cedric Ryngaert
doaj +3 more sources
Jurisdiction of the South Carolina Administrative Law Court [PDF]
, 2009 This guide shows the special jurisdiction of the South Carolina Administrative Law Court including Contested Cases, Appellate Jurisdiction, Contested Case and Appellate Jurisdiction, Regulation Hearings and Injunctive ...
South Carolina Administrative Law Court
core
Conflict Resolution Quarterly, EarlyView.ABSTRACT In family mediation, emotional discomfort and perceived unsafety may signal deeper relational risks, including postseparation violence. Standard intake procedures in Norwegian family mediation depend on disclosure to a nonclinical administrator before any therapeutic relationship exists, and research documents systematic under‐reporting at ...
Jan Stokkebekk +2 more
wiley +1 more source
The Effect of Rules Shifting Supreme Court Jurisdiction from Mandatory to Discretionary - An Empirical Lesson from Taiwan [PDF]
Theoretical works suggest that granting a supreme court discretion in choosing the cases to be decided on the merits could shift dockets away from traditional case-based adjudication and towards issue-based adjudication.
Huang, Kuo-Chang, Eisenberg, Theodore
core
International Journal of Eating Disorders, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Objective Despite the clinical relevance of enteral and parenteral tube feeding and restraint use in anorexia nervosa (AN), national‐level data on their use have remained limited, particularly for total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).
Hiroyasu Ino +3 more
wiley +1 more source
The reform of the testamentary jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical courts, 1830-1857
, 2002 This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University.This thesis traces the efforts of successive Governments of both persuasions to reform the ancient jurisdiction of the spiritual courts over the validity of
Hutton, Brian Gerald
core
The principle of complementarity: the admissibility of cases before the international criminal court [PDF]
, 2007 Regarded as the most important international institution established since the United Nations, the International Criminal Court (ICQ was created to help end impunity.
Gates, David Rosello
core
Constructing Policy (In)coherence in Germany's Energy Transition and Impacts on (In)equality
Environmental Policy and Governance, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Policy coherence is widely regarded as essential for achieving sustainable development, climate targets, and reducing inequality, as reflected in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Recent scholarship has moved beyond technocratic approaches, drawing on comparative politics, particularly the “3 I's” of ideas, interests, and ...
Alexia Faus Onbargi, Ines Dombrowsky
wiley +1 more source