Results 201 to 210 of about 3,003 (258)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
The courtroom as an affective arrangement: analysing atmospheres in courtroom ethnography
The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 2018AbstractThis article proposes a methodological approach to courtroom ethnography by developing the idea of the courtroom as an affective arrangement.
Jonas Bens
openaire +3 more sources
Psychiatric Services, 1984
The courts’ response to the potential contribution of hypnosis to the fact-finding process is illustrative of the consequences of a broader judicial desire for assistance from the mental health professions. Time and again, in their eagerness to facilitate the difficult process of adjudication, the courts have shown themselves susceptible to the ...
openaire +2 more sources
The courts’ response to the potential contribution of hypnosis to the fact-finding process is illustrative of the consequences of a broader judicial desire for assistance from the mental health professions. Time and again, in their eagerness to facilitate the difficult process of adjudication, the courts have shown themselves susceptible to the ...
openaire +2 more sources
The American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
M suits! Trial lawyers! Judgment awards! There is nothing more unsettling to a physician than the thought of a lawsuit and the potential for loss of one’s possessions and income. Physicians dread an attack on their abilities, their reputations, and their selfesteem. They worry about the Physicians Data Bank.
openaire +2 more sources
M suits! Trial lawyers! Judgment awards! There is nothing more unsettling to a physician than the thought of a lawsuit and the potential for loss of one’s possessions and income. Physicians dread an attack on their abilities, their reputations, and their selfesteem. They worry about the Physicians Data Bank.
openaire +2 more sources
Scientific American, 2011
The article discusses the use of neurological evidence, such as brain scans, in courts and how their use could transform judicial views regarding personal credibility and responsibility. According to the author, courts rarely allow the admission of brain scans as evidence at trial for legalistic and scientific reasons.
openaire +2 more sources
The article discusses the use of neurological evidence, such as brain scans, in courts and how their use could transform judicial views regarding personal credibility and responsibility. According to the author, courts rarely allow the admission of brain scans as evidence at trial for legalistic and scientific reasons.
openaire +2 more sources
American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1977
Abstract For the first time in Oregon, and perhaps in the United States, hypnosis was performed in court. This case could be an opening of the door for this important modality. The defendant was found innocent of the murder charge. The part hypnosis played in the jury's deliberation can only be conjectured, since the trial judge dismissed the jury ...
openaire +2 more sources
Abstract For the first time in Oregon, and perhaps in the United States, hypnosis was performed in court. This case could be an opening of the door for this important modality. The defendant was found innocent of the murder charge. The part hypnosis played in the jury's deliberation can only be conjectured, since the trial judge dismissed the jury ...
openaire +2 more sources
Vivid Persuasion in the Courtroom
Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985When witnesses at a trial offer testimony that is vivid, it may be more persuasive than the same testimony offered in a pallid manner. In this paper we elucidate three categories of variables (inferential, attentional/memorial, and affective) that are likely to mediate the effects of the vividness of testimony on jury judgments.
B E, Bell, E F, Loftus
openaire +2 more sources
Is the Rorschach Welcome in the Courtroom?
Journal of Personality Assessment, 1996A survey of 7,934. recent federal and state court cases in which psychologists presented Rorschach testimony revealed only 6 in which the appropriateness of the Rorschach was challenged and just one in which the testimony was not admitted into evidence.
I B, Weiner, J E, Exner, A, Sciara
openaire +2 more sources
Moral Experts in the Courtroom
The Hastings Center Report, 1984I n every jurisdiction rules of evidence permit the courts to call expert witnesses. An "expert," under the liberal legal principles that now prevail in most court systems, is a person who, by reason of specialized training or experience, has the ability to provide the court with a useful and illuminating opinion, inference, or observation relating to ...
P G, McAllen, R, Delgado
openaire +2 more sources
Language in the American Courtroom
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2007Abstract One of the most promising connections that linguistics can make to other fields is to the legal arena, primarily because much of the work in law is done in language and it is often largely about language, either spoken or ...
openaire +1 more source
Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, 1994
An anecdotal account of the experiences of a freelance medical artist in providing artwork for litigation. The requirements for presentation of artwork in court are discussed, and some practical problems addressed. Two examples are shown of cases illustrated for use in court.
openaire +2 more sources
An anecdotal account of the experiences of a freelance medical artist in providing artwork for litigation. The requirements for presentation of artwork in court are discussed, and some practical problems addressed. Two examples are shown of cases illustrated for use in court.
openaire +2 more sources