Results 221 to 230 of about 49,969 (265)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Modernizing Courts or Courting Modernization?
Criminal Justice, 2000The article reviews the way in which the government-led public service modernisation agenda is affecting courts in England and Wales. The pros and cons associated with each of seven tenets of modernisation are explored and the article then argues for a modernisation programme for the courts that better reflects their distinctive circumstances and ...
openaire +1 more source
2018
The Nordic courts and court culture have several distinctive traits: (1) a three-tier court hierarchy with little specialisation; (2) judicial discretion and pragmatism; (3) “Nordic” oral proceedings; (4) lay participation; and (5) the role of Supreme Courts and the doctrine of quasi-stare decisis.
Anna Nylund, Jørn Øyrehagen Sunde
openaire +1 more source
The Nordic courts and court culture have several distinctive traits: (1) a three-tier court hierarchy with little specialisation; (2) judicial discretion and pragmatism; (3) “Nordic” oral proceedings; (4) lay participation; and (5) the role of Supreme Courts and the doctrine of quasi-stare decisis.
Anna Nylund, Jørn Øyrehagen Sunde
openaire +1 more source
The Court of Strasbourg Acting as an Asylum Court
European Constitutional Law Review, 2012Article 3 ECHR and expulsion, extradition – Indirect and potential violations – Interim measures – Lowering of threshold – Transformation from civil to social right – Asylum seekers special vulnerable ...
openaire +2 more sources
BMJ, 2009
Does English libel law threaten scientific debate in health care? Professor Sir Muir Gray, in his book Evidence-based Healthcare 1 tells the old joke about the epidemiologist up in court on a serious charge. “How do you plead? Guilty or not guilty?” asks the judge. “I don’t know: I haven’t heard the evidence yet.” Recent events bring comedy, evidence,
openaire +2 more sources
Does English libel law threaten scientific debate in health care? Professor Sir Muir Gray, in his book Evidence-based Healthcare 1 tells the old joke about the epidemiologist up in court on a serious charge. “How do you plead? Guilty or not guilty?” asks the judge. “I don’t know: I haven’t heard the evidence yet.” Recent events bring comedy, evidence,
openaire +2 more sources
Law, Medicine and Health Care, 1987
Most of us, I think, supposed that the debate over euthanasia (doing something to end a life that could otherwise continue) had been pretty well settled. For a long time a minority favored it and a majority opposed it—at least in principle, although not always in practice.
openaire +2 more sources
Most of us, I think, supposed that the debate over euthanasia (doing something to end a life that could otherwise continue) had been pretty well settled. For a long time a minority favored it and a majority opposed it—at least in principle, although not always in practice.
openaire +2 more sources
Could environmental courts reduce carbon intensity? Evidence from cities of China
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022Yuhuan Zhao
exaly
Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts
Journal of Corporate Finance, 2023Shaojie Lai, Hamish D Anderson
exaly
Environmental Courts, Environment and Employment: Evidence from China
Sustainability, 2021Ling-Yun He +2 more
exaly