Results 271 to 280 of about 169,467 (297)

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz   +2 more
exaly  

Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale

Pain, 2001
John T Farrar
exaly  

Critical review and methodological approach to evaluate the differences among international green building rating tools

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018
Luca Evangelisti, Fabio Bisegna, Paola Gori   +2 more
exaly  

Validity of four pain intensity rating scales

Pain, 2011
Mark P Jensen
exaly  

A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015
Patrick Chen, Hongxing Yang, Lin Lu
exaly  

Credit Rating Agencies

2018
openaire   +1 more source

Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist

Quality of Life Research, 2011
Caroline B Terwee, Lidwine B Mokkink, Raymond W J G Ostelo   +2 more
exaly  

MovementDisorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: Status and recommendations TheMovementDisorder Society Task Force on rating scales for Parkinson's disease

Movement Disorders, 2004
Christopher G Goetz, Werner Poewe, Olivier Rascol   +2 more
exaly  

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Shahnaz Sultan   +2 more
exaly  

A Monopolistic Credit Rating Agency [PDF]

The paper analyses the demand for credit rating services of a continuum of firms. The firms differ in the probability of their investment's success which is private information. They can use the service of a monopolistic rating agency that sends an imperfect signal of their success probability to the capital market. The demand for rating services turns
openaire