Results 341 to 350 of about 4,771,637 (376)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2014
Across-sectional study is an observational study in which the exposure and the outcome are determined at the same time point for each study participant. Cross-sectional studies comprise the simplest individual-level observational study design and are usually relatively inexpensive and easy to conduct compared with case-control or cohort studies.
N. Pandis
semanticscholar +4 more sources
Across-sectional study is an observational study in which the exposure and the outcome are determined at the same time point for each study participant. Cross-sectional studies comprise the simplest individual-level observational study design and are usually relatively inexpensive and easy to conduct compared with case-control or cohort studies.
N. Pandis
semanticscholar +4 more sources
2009
1. Cross-sectional studies measure the exposure and the outcome at the same time. 2. Cross-sectional studies estimate the prevalence of a disease or condition. 3. Cross-sectional studies cannot establish a temporal relationship between the exposure and the outcome.
Manolis Kogevinas, Leda Chatzi
openaire +3 more sources
1. Cross-sectional studies measure the exposure and the outcome at the same time. 2. Cross-sectional studies estimate the prevalence of a disease or condition. 3. Cross-sectional studies cannot establish a temporal relationship between the exposure and the outcome.
Manolis Kogevinas, Leda Chatzi
openaire +3 more sources
2011
Cross-sectional studies are related to sample surveys. In both types of studies a sample S is taken from the target population U, for example by one of the sampling plans presented in Sect. 12.2. The basic difference between the two studies resides in their purpose and, consequently, in the way they are being evaluated. As remarked in Sect.
Klaus Krickeberg +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Cross-sectional studies are related to sample surveys. In both types of studies a sample S is taken from the target population U, for example by one of the sampling plans presented in Sect. 12.2. The basic difference between the two studies resides in their purpose and, consequently, in the way they are being evaluated. As remarked in Sect.
Klaus Krickeberg +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Allergic conjunctivitis: a cross‐sectional study
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2015SummaryBackgroundOcular allergy is a common disease in daily practice.ObjectivesA cross‐sectional study was conducted to evaluate clinical aspects of and therapeutic approaches to ocular allergy in Italy.MethodsOf the 3685 patients affected by ocular allergy and enrolled by 304 ophthalmologists nationally, 3545 were eligible to be included in the ...
LEONARDI, ANDREA +6 more
openaire +4 more sources
Open Source Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing
Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2021We provide data and code that successfully reproduces nearly all crosssectional stock return predictors. Our 319 characteristics draw from previous meta-studies, but we differ by comparing our t-stats to the original papers' results.
Andrew Y. Chen, Tom Zimmermann
semanticscholar +1 more source
2010
In a cross-sectional study, all in a given population or a random sample from this population define the source population. The disease and its possible determinants are all recorded at a given point in time. This introduces a temporal ambiguity in the possible cause–effect association and for this reason most cross-sectional studies have survey ...
Kaare Christensen +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
In a cross-sectional study, all in a given population or a random sample from this population define the source population. The disease and its possible determinants are all recorded at a given point in time. This introduces a temporal ambiguity in the possible cause–effect association and for this reason most cross-sectional studies have survey ...
Kaare Christensen +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
BMJ, 2010
Researchers investigated public perception, anxiety, and behaviour with regard to the outbreak of swine flu.1 A cross sectional survey was used, with random dialling of telephone numbers in England, Scotland, and Wales. In total, 997 adults aged over 18 years—who had heard of swine flu and spoke English—were interviewed between 8 May and 12 May 2009 ...
openaire +2 more sources
Researchers investigated public perception, anxiety, and behaviour with regard to the outbreak of swine flu.1 A cross sectional survey was used, with random dialling of telephone numbers in England, Scotland, and Wales. In total, 997 adults aged over 18 years—who had heard of swine flu and spoke English—were interviewed between 8 May and 12 May 2009 ...
openaire +2 more sources
Cross-sectional studies and methodology
Osteoporosis International, 2012Dear Sir, As I read the study by Patil et al. [1], I noticed that they have not stated several important points; in the methods section, the authors did not state the number of participants they contacted or the method used (telephone or direct interview?). Did they contact all of the study universe?
openaire +3 more sources
A cross‐sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2002AbstractAim: The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in a cross‐sectional study of patients visiting general dental practitioners in the United Kingdom over a period of one calendar month.Methods: Nineteen dental practioners examined 4841 patients over a period of one calendar month and patients that had ...
Martin Addy, Jeremy Simon Rees
openaire +3 more sources