Results 261 to 270 of about 3,322,440 (308)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2009
1. Cross-sectional studies measure the exposure and the outcome at the same time. 2. Cross-sectional studies estimate the prevalence of a disease or condition. 3. Cross-sectional studies cannot establish a temporal relationship between the exposure and the outcome.
Manolis Kogevinas, Leda Chatzi
openaire +3 more sources
1. Cross-sectional studies measure the exposure and the outcome at the same time. 2. Cross-sectional studies estimate the prevalence of a disease or condition. 3. Cross-sectional studies cannot establish a temporal relationship between the exposure and the outcome.
Manolis Kogevinas, Leda Chatzi
openaire +3 more sources
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2014
Across-sectional study is an observational study in which the exposure and the outcome are determined at the same time point for each study participant. Cross-sectional studies comprise the simplest individual-level observational study design and are usually relatively inexpensive and easy to conduct compared with case-control or cohort studies.
openaire +3 more sources
Across-sectional study is an observational study in which the exposure and the outcome are determined at the same time point for each study participant. Cross-sectional studies comprise the simplest individual-level observational study design and are usually relatively inexpensive and easy to conduct compared with case-control or cohort studies.
openaire +3 more sources
2011
Cross-sectional studies are related to sample surveys. In both types of studies a sample S is taken from the target population U, for example by one of the sampling plans presented in Sect. 12.2. The basic difference between the two studies resides in their purpose and, consequently, in the way they are being evaluated. As remarked in Sect.
Klaus Krickeberg +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Cross-sectional studies are related to sample surveys. In both types of studies a sample S is taken from the target population U, for example by one of the sampling plans presented in Sect. 12.2. The basic difference between the two studies resides in their purpose and, consequently, in the way they are being evaluated. As remarked in Sect.
Klaus Krickeberg +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Allergic conjunctivitis: a cross‐sectional study
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2015SummaryBackgroundOcular allergy is a common disease in daily practice.ObjectivesA cross‐sectional study was conducted to evaluate clinical aspects of and therapeutic approaches to ocular allergy in Italy.MethodsOf the 3685 patients affected by ocular allergy and enrolled by 304 ophthalmologists nationally, 3545 were eligible to be included in the ...
LEONARDI, ANDREA +6 more
openaire +4 more sources
2010
In a cross-sectional study, all in a given population or a random sample from this population define the source population. The disease and its possible determinants are all recorded at a given point in time. This introduces a temporal ambiguity in the possible cause–effect association and for this reason most cross-sectional studies have survey ...
Kaare Christensen +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
In a cross-sectional study, all in a given population or a random sample from this population define the source population. The disease and its possible determinants are all recorded at a given point in time. This introduces a temporal ambiguity in the possible cause–effect association and for this reason most cross-sectional studies have survey ...
Kaare Christensen +3 more
openaire +2 more sources