Do Intoxicated Offenders Deserve Harsher Sentences? Questioning Veritas in Vino
ABSTRACT Criminal courts increasingly treat intoxication as an aggravating rather than a mitigating factor in sentencing. This shift, seen in Australian law and other jurisdictions, raises the prospect of unjust outcomes. We examine this trend through the lens of desert‐based justifications for punishment, setting aside questions of deterrence and ...
Mary Jean Walker, Daniel B. Cohen
wiley +1 more source
Investigators are human too: outcome bias and perceptions of individual culpability in patient safety incident investigations. [PDF]
Lea W +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Explaining Societal Shifts in Victim Blaming and Perpetrator Culpability for Sexual Violence: Evidence From the #MeToo Era. [PDF]
Abrams Z.
europepmc +1 more source
Memorable media messages of mental illness and implications for policy support: examining the influences of racial ingroup/outgroup recall. [PDF]
Riles JM +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Implicit bias attribution reduces prosocial emotions and donation intentions for natural disaster victims. [PDF]
Bak H +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
When forensic psychiatry clashes with jurisdiction: nemesis and challenges of a patient suffering from glioblastoma. [PDF]
D'Imperio A +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
WHO's criteria for ethical health research priority-setting in the context of climate change. [PDF]
Pratt B, van der Graaf R, Samuel G.
europepmc +1 more source
The Pro‐Office Mindset. Anticorruption Beyond Legal Instruments
Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
Emanuela Ceva, Patrizia Pedrini
wiley +1 more source

