Results 211 to 220 of about 96,981 (326)
Commentary: The Infected Blood Inquiry in the United Kingdom-Let the Dust Settle. [PDF]
Farrugia A.
europepmc +1 more source
Behavioural culpability for traffic accidents
L. Dorn, A. Wåhlberg
semanticscholar +1 more source
ABSTRACT When algorithmic decision‐making systems fail to function as intended, they become conduits for administrative error and risk producing arbitrary determinations through the very technologies meant to prevent them. Analysis of 71 federal and state court dockets contesting algorithm‐based determinations in disability, unemployment, and nutrition
Esra Gules‐Guctas
wiley +1 more source
Editorial: Law and neuroscience: justice as a challenge for neurorights, neurolaw, and forensic psychology. [PDF]
García-López E +2 more
europepmc +1 more source
Corporations, Consumerism and Culpability: Sustainability in the British Press
Kristina Diprose +6 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Culpable Ignorance and Causal Deviance
ABSTRACT I argue that tracing theorists of culpability for ignorant wrongdoing should reject the widely accepted principle that culpability for ignorant wrongdoing should always be traced through culpability for the ignorance itself. Two kinds of cases are considered in which culpability for ignorant wrongdoing ultimately traces back to culpability for
Thomas A. Yates
wiley +1 more source
Shifting sands: Mental disorder defense from section 84 IPC to Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. [PDF]
Philip S, Malathesh BC.
europepmc +1 more source
ABSTRACT Lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS), while offering strategic advantages in warfare, pose significant ethical, legal, and security risks, especially for countries in the Global South. This article examines how a philosophical perspective, rooted in African ethical and political thought, can enrich regional and global debates on regulating ...
Ezenwa E. Olumba +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Unspoken wounds: a mother's experience of medical error. [PDF]
MacGregor L.
europepmc +1 more source
In opposition to alethic views of moral responsibility
Abstract A standard analysis of moral responsibility states that an agent A is morally responsible for φ‐ing if and only if it is fitting to have—depending on the nature of φ—a negative or positive reactive emotion vis‐à‐vis A on account of A's φ‐ing. Proponents of Alethic views of moral responsibility maintain that the relevant notion of fittingness ...
Robert Pál‐Wallin
wiley +1 more source

