Results 241 to 250 of about 84,797 (287)
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Volume 112, Issue 2, Page 544-560, March 2026.ABSTRACT Consent plays an important role in our lives. Using someone's body or property without their consent is typically a serious wrong. However, there are various ways in which consensual interactions may be morally deficient. This paper articulates an underexplored way in which consent can be defective, namely by being moot.
Elise Woodard
wiley +1 more source
The specificity of the Threat/Control-Override concept in schizophrenia - new insights from a retrospective cross-sectional study of forensic homicide offenders. [PDF]
Front PsychiatryFindeis H, Strauß M, Kröber HL.
europepmc +1 more source
Public Administration Review, Volume 86, Issue 2, Page 371-382, March/April 2026.ABSTRACT When algorithmic decision‐making systems fail to function as intended, they become conduits for administrative error and risk producing arbitrary determinations through the very technologies meant to prevent them. Analysis of 71 federal and state court dockets contesting algorithm‐based determinations in disability, unemployment, and nutrition
Esra Gules‐Guctas
wiley +1 more source
Key determinants of "Serious Circumstances" in awarding punitive damages for intellectual property infringement: Evidence from Chinese Judicial Judgments. [PDF]
PLoS OneYou K.
europepmc +1 more source
Culpable Ignorance and Causal Deviance
Ratio, Volume 39, Issue 1, Page 26-34, March 2026.ABSTRACT I argue that tracing theorists of culpability for ignorant wrongdoing should reject the widely accepted principle that culpability for ignorant wrongdoing should always be traced through culpability for the ignorance itself. Two kinds of cases are considered in which culpability for ignorant wrongdoing ultimately traces back to culpability for
Thomas A. Yates
wiley +1 more source
Editorial: Emotions in neuroscience: fundamentals and new discoveries. [PDF]
Front Integr NeurosciSilani G, Aglioti SM, Perani D.
europepmc +1 more source
In opposition to alethic views of moral responsibility
The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Volume 64, Issue 1, Page 85-103, March 2026.Abstract A standard analysis of moral responsibility states that an agent A is morally responsible for φ‐ing if and only if it is fitting to have—depending on the nature of φ—a negative or positive reactive emotion vis‐à‐vis A on account of A's φ‐ing. Proponents of Alethic views of moral responsibility maintain that the relevant notion of fittingness ...
Robert Pál‐Wallin
wiley +1 more source
Experiences of stigma among caregivers of children with disabilities in Freetown. [PDF]
Sci RepLuetke Lanfer H +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Why Logic, Experience, and Precedent Compel the Demise of Mandatory Sentencing Statutes [PDF]
, 2013 Wray, William, Jr.
core +1 more source