Results 241 to 250 of about 772,601 (287)
Cut-Elimination for Quantified Conditional Logic
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Christoph Benzmüller
exaly +4 more sources
We investigate cut elimination in multi-focused sequent calculi and the impact on the cut elimination proof of design choices in such calculi. The particular design we advocate is illustrated by a multi-focused calculus for full linear logic using an explicitly polarised syntax and incremental focus handling, for which we provide a syntactic cut ...
Taus Brock-Nannestad, Nicolas Guenot
openaire +2 more sources
This is the first book on cut-elimination in first-order predicate logic from an algorithmic point of view. Instead of just proving the existence of cut-free proofs, it focuses on the algorithmic methods transforming proofs with arbitrary cuts to proofs ...
Alexander Leitsch, Matthias Baaz
exaly +3 more sources
Cut-Elimination: Experiments with CERES
Cut-elimination is the most prominent form of proof transformation in logic. The elimination of cuts in formal proofs corresponds to the removal of intermediate statements (lemmas) in mathematical proofs. The cut-elimination method CERES (cut-elimination by resolution) works by constructing a set of clauses from a proof with cuts.
Matthias Baaz +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Cut Elimination for S4C: A Case Study
Studia Logica, 2006The paper contains a cut-elimination proof for a logic of continuous transformations of a topological space, called S4C [cf. \textit{P. Kremer} and \textit{G. Mints}, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 131, No. 1--3, 133--158 (2005; Zbl 1067.03028)]. It consists of the modal logic S4 enlarged by another modality operator \(\circ\). In the intended models of dynamic
Grigori Mints, Mints Grigori
exaly +3 more sources
Corrected upper bounds for free-cut elimination
Free-cut elimination allows cut elimination to be carried out in the presence of non-logical axioms. Formulas in a proof are anchored provided they originate in a non-logical axiom or non-logical inference.
Arnold Beckmann, Samuel R Buss
exaly +2 more sources

