Results 161 to 170 of about 17,373 (192)

Lagrangian Relations and Quantum L ∞ Algebras. [PDF]

open access: yesCommun Math Phys
Jurčo B, Pulmann J, Zika M.
europepmc   +1 more source

DE RHAM COHOMOLOGY

2003
In Chapter 14, we defined closed and exact differential forms, and showed that every exact form is closed. In this chapter, we explore the converse question: Is every closed form exact? The answer is locally yes, but globally no. The question of which closed forms are exact depends on subtle topological properties of the manifold, connected with the ...
openaire   +2 more sources

de Rham cohomology of local cohomology modules II

Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie / Contributions to Algebra and Geometry, 2018
Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, $R = K[x_1, \dots, x_n]$, $I$ be an ideal in $R$ and $A_n(K) = K \langle x_1, \dots, x_n, \partial_1, \dots, \partial_n\rangle$ be the $n$th Weyl algebra over $K$. For a given holonomic left $A_n(K)$-module $N$, let $\partial=\partial_1, \dots, \partial_n$ be pairwise commuting $K$-linear
Puthenpurakal, Tony J.   +1 more
openaire   +1 more source

Finiteness of De Rham Cohomology

American Journal of Mathematics, 1972
When k = C these groups have topological significance. Grothendieck proved in [1] that HDRt(A) -H$(V;C) where V is the complex manifold attached to A. From this one can see that I"DR (A) is finite dimensional when k C, and the result extends easily to all k of characteristic zero.
openaire   +1 more source

Algebraic de Rham Cohomology

2017
Let k be a field of characteristic zero. We are going to define relative algebraic de Rham cohomology for general varieties over k, not necessarily smooth.
Annette Huber, Stefan Müller-Stach
openaire   +1 more source

De Rham Cohomology

2001
We turn now from classical vector analysis to a completely different aspect of the calculus of differential forms. Consider the de Rham complex $$0 \to {\Omega ^0}M{\Omega ^1}M \cdots $$ of a manifold M. The property d ο d = 0 means that $$im(d:{\Omega ^{k - 1}}M \to {\Omega ^k}M) \subset \ker (d:{\Omega ^k}M \to {\Omega ^{k + 1}}M)$$ for
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy