Results 161 to 170 of about 17,373 (192)
PERSISTENT DIRAC OF PATHS ON DIGRAPHS AND HYPERGRAPHS. [PDF]
Suwayyid F, Wei GW.
europepmc +1 more source
Lagrangian Relations and Quantum L ∞ Algebras. [PDF]
Jurčo B, Pulmann J, Zika M.
europepmc +1 more source
From Geometry of Hamiltonian Dynamics to Topology of Phase Transitions: A Review. [PDF]
Pettini G, Gori M, Pettini M.
europepmc +1 more source
De Rham intersection cohomology for general perversities
Martintxo Saralegi-Aranguren
openalex +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
2003
In Chapter 14, we defined closed and exact differential forms, and showed that every exact form is closed. In this chapter, we explore the converse question: Is every closed form exact? The answer is locally yes, but globally no. The question of which closed forms are exact depends on subtle topological properties of the manifold, connected with the ...
openaire +2 more sources
In Chapter 14, we defined closed and exact differential forms, and showed that every exact form is closed. In this chapter, we explore the converse question: Is every closed form exact? The answer is locally yes, but globally no. The question of which closed forms are exact depends on subtle topological properties of the manifold, connected with the ...
openaire +2 more sources
de Rham cohomology of local cohomology modules II
Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie / Contributions to Algebra and Geometry, 2018Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, $R = K[x_1, \dots, x_n]$, $I$ be an ideal in $R$ and $A_n(K) = K \langle x_1, \dots, x_n, \partial_1, \dots, \partial_n\rangle$ be the $n$th Weyl algebra over $K$. For a given holonomic left $A_n(K)$-module $N$, let $\partial=\partial_1, \dots, \partial_n$ be pairwise commuting $K$-linear
Puthenpurakal, Tony J. +1 more
openaire +1 more source
Finiteness of De Rham Cohomology
American Journal of Mathematics, 1972When k = C these groups have topological significance. Grothendieck proved in [1] that HDRt(A) -H$(V;C) where V is the complex manifold attached to A. From this one can see that I"DR (A) is finite dimensional when k C, and the result extends easily to all k of characteristic zero.
openaire +1 more source
2017
Let k be a field of characteristic zero. We are going to define relative algebraic de Rham cohomology for general varieties over k, not necessarily smooth.
Annette Huber, Stefan Müller-Stach
openaire +1 more source
Let k be a field of characteristic zero. We are going to define relative algebraic de Rham cohomology for general varieties over k, not necessarily smooth.
Annette Huber, Stefan Müller-Stach
openaire +1 more source
2001
We turn now from classical vector analysis to a completely different aspect of the calculus of differential forms. Consider the de Rham complex $$0 \to {\Omega ^0}M{\Omega ^1}M \cdots $$ of a manifold M. The property d ο d = 0 means that $$im(d:{\Omega ^{k - 1}}M \to {\Omega ^k}M) \subset \ker (d:{\Omega ^k}M \to {\Omega ^{k + 1}}M)$$ for
openaire +1 more source
We turn now from classical vector analysis to a completely different aspect of the calculus of differential forms. Consider the de Rham complex $$0 \to {\Omega ^0}M{\Omega ^1}M \cdots $$ of a manifold M. The property d ο d = 0 means that $$im(d:{\Omega ^{k - 1}}M \to {\Omega ^k}M) \subset \ker (d:{\Omega ^k}M \to {\Omega ^{k + 1}}M)$$ for
openaire +1 more source

