Results 211 to 220 of about 421,385 (279)

[Humanization: A Conceptual and Attitudinal Problem]. [PDF]

open access: yesRev Iberoam Bioet, 2018
Castro LR   +10 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Algunas distorsiones lingüísticas en las decisiones judiciales brasileñas

open access: yes
Resumen A lo largo de más de 20 años de ejercicio de la abogacía popular en Brasil, he observado sentencias judiciales en las que había afirmaciones textuales sobre los discursos de las partes que consideraba lingüísticamente inviables. La investigación, de carácter exploratorio y cualitativo, con ligeros toques cuantitativos, se llevó a cabo con el ...
openaire   +1 more source

La moral en la justificación de las decisiones judiciales

open access: yesAnales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez, 2020
openaire   +1 more source

Liquid Assemblies: An Institutional Design for Liquid Democracy

open access: yes
Constellations, EarlyView.
Chiara Valsangiacomo Balmelli   +1 more
wiley   +1 more source

Patient Safety and Organisational Accountability: Reassessing Criminal Liability Frameworks in Healthcare

open access: yesThe Modern Law Review, EarlyView.
Serious harm in healthcare often results from systemic failures, yet criminal accountability remains largely addressed through homicide law, gross negligence manslaughter and health‐and‐safety offences, frameworks that emphasise individual culpability and are ill‐suited to addressing organisational failings.
Sarah Bennett, Amel Alghrani
wiley   +1 more source

Integration Through Rights: Towards an Associational Paradigm

open access: yesThe Modern Law Review, EarlyView.
Integration policies in the EU and the UK have over the past two decades increasingly emphasised duties and constraints for migrants. This article challenges the duty‐based model and proposes an alternative legal conception: ‘integration through rights’, with associational rights taking a central role.
Sarah Ganty, Clíodhna Murphy
wiley   +1 more source

X v The Lord Advocate: Challenges and Concerns for Vicarious Liability

open access: yesThe Modern Law Review, EarlyView.
In X v The Lord Advocate, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the Crown cannot be vicariously liable for torts committed by judges. This case note critically examines what could be viewed as two significant doctrinal shifts that were introduced by this ruling.
Haim Abraham
wiley   +1 more source

Documentación: Decisiones de los órganos judiciales

open access: yes, 2007
Cervell-Hortal, M.J. (María José)   +1 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy