Results 111 to 120 of about 391 (150)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology, 1955
Abstract From the foregoing discussion and case findings, it is seen that dens in dente is a very interesting dental anomaly. The purpose of this article is to make the general practitioner cognizant of the fact that this condition does exist and that it can affect clinical dentistry.
L S, FISHMAN, J, FRIEDMAN
exaly +3 more sources
Abstract From the foregoing discussion and case findings, it is seen that dens in dente is a very interesting dental anomaly. The purpose of this article is to make the general practitioner cognizant of the fact that this condition does exist and that it can affect clinical dentistry.
L S, FISHMAN, J, FRIEDMAN
exaly +3 more sources
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology, 1974
Abstract The developmental anomaly named “dens in dente” has been described as a lingual invagination of the enamel, occurring most frequently in the maxillary incisor teeth. Once thought to be a rare anomaly, subsequent investigations indicate that it occurs with greater frequency than previously suspected.
exaly +4 more sources
Abstract The developmental anomaly named “dens in dente” has been described as a lingual invagination of the enamel, occurring most frequently in the maxillary incisor teeth. Once thought to be a rare anomaly, subsequent investigations indicate that it occurs with greater frequency than previously suspected.
exaly +4 more sources
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology, 1952
William G Shafer, Maynard K Hine
exaly +2 more sources
William G Shafer, Maynard K Hine
exaly +2 more sources
1985
History. This lesion was first described by Tomes in 1859 (quoted in Gustafson and Sundberg 1950). Since then much research has been done, particularly into the cause of this malformation. Many authors have suggested that only a quantitative difference exists between a deep foramen cecum, a dens in dente, and an odontoma (Gustafson and Sundberg 1950).
Joachim Prein +3 more
openaire +1 more source
History. This lesion was first described by Tomes in 1859 (quoted in Gustafson and Sundberg 1950). Since then much research has been done, particularly into the cause of this malformation. Many authors have suggested that only a quantitative difference exists between a deep foramen cecum, a dens in dente, and an odontoma (Gustafson and Sundberg 1950).
Joachim Prein +3 more
openaire +1 more source