Results 161 to 170 of about 10,385,935 (266)

Influence of implant configuration on stress distribution in quad zygoma implant systems: A finite element analysis

Journal of Prosthodontics, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different zygomatic implant configurations on the biomechanical behavior of implant‐supported prosthetic systems under varying bone conditions using finite element analysis. Materials and Methods Four three‐dimensional (3D) finite element models were developed based on two different anatomical
Ercin Samunahmetoglu, Ilgın Ari, Arzum Yilmaz   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Zirconia abutments and reduced crown-to-implant ratios: Insights into stress distribution. [PDF]

Braz Oral Res
Grassi L, Silva AG, Borges GA, Vitti RP, Barão VAR, Miranda ME, Brandt WC, Costa RC.   +7 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Clinical implications of misfit in multiunit implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review

Journal of Prosthodontics, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose This systematic review aimed to evaluate the long‐term effects of misfit on the clinical outcomes of multiunit implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (ISFDPs). Methods An electronic literature search was conducted up to December 2025 across five databases: MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library ...
Zijing He, Vincent Bennani, John M. Aarts, Joanne Jung Eun Choi, Arthi Veerasamy   +4 more
wiley   +1 more source

Effect of Connection Geometry and Cantilever Length on the Mechanical Behavior of Ti6Al4V and PEEK Bar-Supported Implant Prostheses with Angled Abutments. [PDF]

J Funct Biomater
Akgün G.
europepmc   +1 more source

Relative accuracy of intraoral photogrammetry and intraoral scanning with conventional scan‐body for full‐arch implants

Journal of Prosthodontics, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose To compare the relative accuracy of intraoral photogrammetry (IPG) and intraoral scan (IOS) with conventional scan bodies (IOS‐CB) for complete‐arch implant impressions, using the conventional splinted open‐tray impression digitized with a laboratory scanner (COT‐LS) as the reference standard.
Sherif Aly Sadek, Mona Samir Gaber, Marwa Hassan Mostafa, Hadiel Zamzam   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Investigation of Surface Morphology and Roughness of Dental Implant Platform and Abutment. [PDF]

Dent J (Basel)
Filipova T, Peev S, Mitkov S.
europepmc   +1 more source

Assessing angular and linear misfits in zirconia frameworks through torque/time graph interpretation: A proof of concept

Journal of Prosthodontics, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose Passive fit in implant‐supported complete‐arch prostheses is the key to long‐term success. The aim of this in vitro, proof‐of‐concept study was to examine whether torque/time graphs generated from a surgical motor during the prosthetic screw insertion process show consistent patterns of digitally controlled angular and linear misfits ...
Carla Vidal‐Ponsoda, Lucas Queiroz Caponi, Emilio Quirós Alcón, Pablo Rodríguez Martínez, Oscar Figueras‐Álvarez, Miguel Roig   +5 more
wiley   +1 more source

Osseointegrated Dental Implants as Retention Systems for Digit Prostheses in Finger Amputations. [PDF]

Adv Orthop
Alzoubi A, Alhiasat I, Almigdad A, Rababah A, Al-Khawaldeh A.   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Accuracy and clinical passive fit of reverse and standard scan body protocols for complete‐arch implant‐supported digital impressions: An in vitro study

Journal of Prosthodontics, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the reverse scan body (RSB) and standard scan body (SCB) protocols for complete‐arch implant‐supported digital impressions with respect to root mean square (RMS), linear deviation, and angular deviation values, as well as clinical passive fit.
Rabia Kilicaslan Dasdelen, Ikbal Leblebicioglu Kurtulus, Kerem Kilic   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Comparative trueness of complete‐arch implant position acquisition using auxiliary geometric device–aided and noncalibrated scanbody–based intraoral scanning versus smartphone‐based and dedicated extraoral photogrammetry

Journal of Prosthodontics, EarlyView.
Abstract Purpose To compare the trueness of four techniques for complete‐arch implant position acquisition: intraoral implant scanning (IOIS) using auxiliary geometric devices (AGDs), IOIS using horizontally extended noncalibrated scanbodies (NCSBs), smartphone‐based extraoral photogrammetry (EPG), and EPG with a dedicated scanner, with the null ...
Mohamed Sherif Omar, Yi‐Hao Lan, Toshiki Nagai, Chao‐Chieh Yang, Wei‐Shao Lin   +4 more
wiley   +1 more source