Results 191 to 200 of about 1,893,003 (254)

Effect of combining dentin bonding agents

European Journal of Oral Sciences, 1985
Abstract The wall‐to‐wall polymerization contraction of a light‐cured composite was measured in cylindrical dentin cavities treated with the bonding agents: Scotchbond, Clearfil Bond, Gluma/Scotchbond, Gluma/Silux Enamel Bond or Gluma/Clearfil Bond. Marginal gaps were prevented in 29 out of 30 cases when Gluma was used in combination with Clearfil Bond.
E C Munksgaard   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Mutagenicity of dentin bonding agents

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1994
AbstractAside from the considerable number of reports on the physical and chemical properties of dental bonding agents, information concerning their biologic effects is sparse. Three dentin bonding agents (Prisma Universal Bond, Pertac Universal Bond, and Syntac) and the ingredients methylmethacrylate, 2‐hydroxyethyl‐methacrylate, and glutaraldehyde ...
H, Schweikl, G, Schmalz, B, Bey
openaire   +2 more sources

The characteristics and performance of dentine bonding agents

Clinical Materials, 1993
Several attempts have been made to synthesise dentine bonding systems, but low bonding strength, increased variance, toxicity and poor hydrolytic stability were some of the disadvantages excluding them from being widely approved. However, many dentine bonding systems are considered to be biocompatible and have become commercially available.
S A, Ali, D F, Williams
openaire   +2 more sources

Improved efficacy of dentin‐bonding agents

European Journal of Oral Sciences, 1997
Dentin cavities, prepared in extracted human teeth, were treated with various proprietary dentin‐bonding agents and then filled with a light‐cured restorative resin for posterior use. All bonding agents were either treated in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions or combined with Gluma, which is an aqueous solution of glutaraldehyde and HEMA,
Hansen, E.K., Asmussen, E.
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy