Results 161 to 170 of about 13,493 (213)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Generalizing Deontic Action Logic

Studia Logica, 2022
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Alessandro Giordani, Matteo Pascucci
openaire   +1 more source

Contextual Deontic Logic

1999
In this article we propose contextual deontic logic. Contextual obligations are written as O(α|β\γ), and are to be read as 'α should be the case if β is the case, unless γ is the case'. The unless clause is analogous to the justification in Reiter's default rules.
van der Torre, L.W.N., Tan, Y.
openaire   +3 more sources

Andersonian deontic logic*

Theoria, 1992
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire   +2 more sources

Situationist Deontic Logic

Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1997
Situationist deontic logic is deontic logic restricted in application to single situations and single sets of alternatives, thus taking no account of change or variation of agent's perspective, and representing no general norms. Even within this limited domain, standard deontic logic exhibits noteworthy problems.
openaire   +1 more source

Deontic Logic

2012
International audience ; Deontic logic is the logic of obligation and permission. In the literature it has mainly been studied in terms of a list of problems and that is the way we chose to present it in this section. There are three main categories of problems. The first category is concerned with the nature of norms.
Broersen, Jan   +6 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Deontic Logic

2018
Deontic logic is the investigation of the logic of normative concepts, especially obligation (‘ought’, ‘should’, ‘must’), permission (‘may’) and prohibition (‘ought not’, ‘forbidden’). Deontic logic differs from normative legal theory and ethics in that it does not attempt to determine which principles hold, nor what obligations exist, for any given ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Deontic logic without deontic operators

Theory and Decision, 1971
The usual axioms and inference rules of deontic logic employ as a new primitive term an operator for ‘obligatory’ or for ‘permitted’. These axioms and inference rules are here derived from a language which instead of the operator contains a predicate ‘admissible’ defined on the set of state descriptions of an assertoric language.
openaire   +2 more sources

Relevant deontic logic

Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1992
Novel conditions of relevance are defined for conditionals in order to weed out some of the deontic paradoxes, such as Ross's paradox. Semantically, first-degree positive relevant entailment is defined in terms of fulfilment conditions, which are sets of sets of literals (atomic sentences or their negations).
openaire   +2 more sources

Utilitarian deontic logic

Philosophical Studies, 1996
Demontrant que les systemes de logique deontique developpes dans la cadre general de l'utilitarisme ou du consequentialisme negligent l'importance de la probabilite et de la valeur, l'A. propose une alternative au modele utilitariste qui rend compte du poids probabiliste de la valeur dans l'enonce definissant ce que doit faire une personne (ought to do)
openaire   +1 more source

On deontic logic

Studia Logica, 1980
Some requirements concerning deontic logic are formulated and discussed. Stress is laid on the need to distinguish between theories and deductive systems. It is argued that deontic theories need not be closed under the rule of detachment. Two deontic calculi, called DSC1, DSC2, are presented and talked over.
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy