Results 161 to 170 of about 13,565 (215)
One Heresy and One Orthodoxy: On Dialetheism, Dimathematism, and the Non-normativity of Logic. [PDF]
ErkenntnisWansing H.
europepmc +1 more source
Online legal driving behavior monitoring for self-driving vehicles. [PDF]
Nat CommunYu W +9 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Generalizing Deontic Action Logic
Studia Logica, 2022zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Alessandro Giordani, Matteo Pascucci
openaire +1 more source
1999
In this article we propose contextual deontic logic. Contextual obligations are written as O(α|β\γ), and are to be read as 'α should be the case if β is the case, unless γ is the case'. The unless clause is analogous to the justification in Reiter's default rules.
van der Torre, L.W.N., Tan, Y.
openaire +3 more sources
In this article we propose contextual deontic logic. Contextual obligations are written as O(α|β\γ), and are to be read as 'α should be the case if β is the case, unless γ is the case'. The unless clause is analogous to the justification in Reiter's default rules.
van der Torre, L.W.N., Tan, Y.
openaire +3 more sources
Theoria, 1992
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1997
Situationist deontic logic is deontic logic restricted in application to single situations and single sets of alternatives, thus taking no account of change or variation of agent's perspective, and representing no general norms. Even within this limited domain, standard deontic logic exhibits noteworthy problems.
openaire +1 more source
Situationist deontic logic is deontic logic restricted in application to single situations and single sets of alternatives, thus taking no account of change or variation of agent's perspective, and representing no general norms. Even within this limited domain, standard deontic logic exhibits noteworthy problems.
openaire +1 more source
2012
International audience ; Deontic logic is the logic of obligation and permission. In the literature it has mainly been studied in terms of a list of problems and that is the way we chose to present it in this section. There are three main categories of problems. The first category is concerned with the nature of norms.
Broersen, Jan +6 more
openaire +3 more sources
International audience ; Deontic logic is the logic of obligation and permission. In the literature it has mainly been studied in terms of a list of problems and that is the way we chose to present it in this section. There are three main categories of problems. The first category is concerned with the nature of norms.
Broersen, Jan +6 more
openaire +3 more sources
2018
Deontic logic is the investigation of the logic of normative concepts, especially obligation (‘ought’, ‘should’, ‘must’), permission (‘may’) and prohibition (‘ought not’, ‘forbidden’). Deontic logic differs from normative legal theory and ethics in that it does not attempt to determine which principles hold, nor what obligations exist, for any given ...
openaire +2 more sources
Deontic logic is the investigation of the logic of normative concepts, especially obligation (‘ought’, ‘should’, ‘must’), permission (‘may’) and prohibition (‘ought not’, ‘forbidden’). Deontic logic differs from normative legal theory and ethics in that it does not attempt to determine which principles hold, nor what obligations exist, for any given ...
openaire +2 more sources
Deontic logic without deontic operators
Theory and Decision, 1971The usual axioms and inference rules of deontic logic employ as a new primitive term an operator for ‘obligatory’ or for ‘permitted’. These axioms and inference rules are here derived from a language which instead of the operator contains a predicate ‘admissible’ defined on the set of state descriptions of an assertoric language.
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1992
Novel conditions of relevance are defined for conditionals in order to weed out some of the deontic paradoxes, such as Ross's paradox. Semantically, first-degree positive relevant entailment is defined in terms of fulfilment conditions, which are sets of sets of literals (atomic sentences or their negations).
openaire +2 more sources
Novel conditions of relevance are defined for conditionals in order to weed out some of the deontic paradoxes, such as Ross's paradox. Semantically, first-degree positive relevant entailment is defined in terms of fulfilment conditions, which are sets of sets of literals (atomic sentences or their negations).
openaire +2 more sources