Results 71 to 80 of about 176 (86)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Prediction of the efficacy of dinoprostone slow release vaginal insert (Propess) for cervical ripening: A prospective cohort study

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2018
Yair Daykan   +2 more
exaly  

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes

European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2019
Rohan Chodankar
exaly  

Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010
Luis Sanchez-Ramos, C David Adair
exaly  

A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
Patrick Rozenberg   +2 more
exaly  

Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: A randomized trial

European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2008
Anna Maria Marconi, Giorgio Pardi
exaly  

Induction of labour: A comparison between controlled‐release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil®) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2®)

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2008
Lynn Sadler, Lesley M E Mccowan
exaly  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy