Results 11 to 20 of about 1,683 (206)
, 1982 Dipodomys elephantinus (Grinnell, 1919). Univ. Calif. Publ. ZooL, 21:43. TYPE LOCALITY: U.S.A., California, San Benito Co., Bear Valley, 1 mi. (1.6 km) N. Cook P.O., 1300 ft. (396 m). DISTRIBUTION: W.C. California (U.S.A.). COMMENT: May be conspecific with venustus; see Stock, 1974, J. Mammal., 55:505, and Schnell et al., 1978, Syst. ZooL, 27:34.
James H. Honacki +2 more
core +4 more sources
, 1982 Dipodomys panamintinus (Merriam, 1894). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 9: 114. TYPE LOCALITY: U.S.A., California, Inyo Co., Panamint Mtns., head of Willow Creek. DISTRIBUTION: W.C. Nevada to S.C. California; isolated population in S. Nevada and adjacent California (U.S.A.). ISIS NUMBER: 5301410004001015001.
James H. Honacki +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
, 1993 Dipodomys panamintinus (Merriam, 1894). Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 9:114. TYPE LOCALITY: USA, California, Inyo Co., Panamint Mtns, head of Willow Creek. DISTRIBUTION: Deserts of E California and W Nevada (USA). SYNONYMS: argusensis Huey, caudatus Hall, leucogenys Grinnell, mohavensis Grinnell.
James L. Patton
openaire +3 more sources
, 1982 Dipodomys ingens (Merriam, 1904). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 17: 141. TYPE LOCALITY: U.S.A., California, San Luis Obispo Co., Carrizo Plain, Painted Rock, 20 mi. (32 km) S.E. of Simmler. DISTRIBUTION: S.W. San Joaquin Valley and adjacent areas (W.C. California, U.S.A.). ISIS NUMBER: 5301410004001007001.
James H. Honacki +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Evolutionary ApplicationsHabitat loss and fragmentation are major drivers of biodiversity decline, reducing connectivity among populations and leading to genetic isolation, loss of diversity, increased inbreeding, and reduced fitness.
Debra M. Shier +7 more
doaj +2 more sources
, 1982 Dipodomys stephensi (Merriam, 1907). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 20:78. TYPE LOCALITY: U.S.A., California, Riverside Co., San Jacinto Valley, W. of Winchester. DISTRIBUTION: S.W. California (U.S.A.). COMMENT: Includes cascus; relationships to other species of the heermanni group studied by Lackey, 1967, Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist., 14:313. Reviewed by
James H. Honacki +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
, 1982 Published as part of James H. Honacki, Kenneth E. Kinman & James W. Koeppl, 1982, Order Rodentia (Part 2), pp. 382-392 in Mammal Species of the World (1 st Edition), Lawrence, Kansas, USA :Alien Press, Inc.
James H. Honacki +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
, 1993 Published as part of James L. Patton, 1993, Order Rodentia - Family Heteromyidae, pp. 477-486 in Mammal Species of the World (2 nd Edition), Washington and London :Smithsonian Institution Press on page 480, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo ...
James L. Patton
openaire +2 more sources
, 1993 Dipodomys Gray, 1841. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., [ser. 1], 7:521. TYPE SPECIES: Dipodomys phillipsii Gray 1841. SYNONYMS: Dipodops Merriam, Perodipus Fitzinger. COMMENTS: Interspecific relationships summarized by Setzer (1949), Lidicker (1960), Johnson and Selander (1971), Stock (1974), Best and Schnell (1974), and Schnell et al. (1978).
James L. Patton
openaire +3 more sources
Abundance-Occupancy Relationships are Informed by Species Temporal Occupancy. [PDF]
Ecol EvolUnderstanding how species spatial and temporal distributions are related to abundance is fundamental to ecology. Indeed, the relationship between species spatial occupancy and abundance has been investigated across taxa and environments. Less studied, is how species temporal occupancy may inform the spatial abundance–occupancy relationship.
Holian LA, Ten Caten C, Dallas TA.
europepmc +2 more sources