Results 221 to 230 of about 681,287 (260)
Direct Sums of Rickart Modules
A right \(R\)-module \(M\) with endomorphism ring \(S=\text{End}_R(M)\) is called a Rickart module if the right annihilator in \(M\) of any single element of \(S\) is a direct summand of \(M\). In general, the class of Rickart modules is not closed under direct sums, and it is interesting to study when it has this closure property.
Gangyong Lee +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Boletín de la Sociedad Matemática Mexicana, 2015
Let \(R\) be an associative ring with an identity element. A unital right \(R\)-module \(M\) is called ADS* if for any direct summand \(N\) of \(M\) and any supplement \(K\) of \(N\) in \(M\) one has \(M=N\oplus K\). The aim of this paper is to investigate direct sums of ADS* modules. First, the authors provide a bunch of examples of ADS* modules whose
KESKİN TÜTÜNCÜ, DERYA +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Let \(R\) be an associative ring with an identity element. A unital right \(R\)-module \(M\) is called ADS* if for any direct summand \(N\) of \(M\) and any supplement \(K\) of \(N\) in \(M\) one has \(M=N\oplus K\). The aim of this paper is to investigate direct sums of ADS* modules. First, the authors provide a bunch of examples of ADS* modules whose
KESKİN TÜTÜNCÜ, DERYA +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Direct Sums of Infinitely Many Kernels [PDF]
AbstractLet 𝒦 be the class of all rightR-modules that are kernels of nonzero homomorphisms φ:E1→E2for some pair of indecomposable injective rightR-modulesE1,E2. In a previous paper, we completely characterized when two direct sumsA1⊕⋯⊕AnandB1⊕⋯⊕Bmof finitely many modulesAiand Bjin 𝒦 are isomorphic.
Alberto Facchini
exaly +6 more sources
The direct sum of universal relations
Information Processing Letters, 2018zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
Advances in Operator Theory, 2023
Let \(A\) be a square matrix partitioned as follows: \[ A = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} B & C \\ D & E \end{array} \right]. \] The authors study several sufficient conditions on \(A\) to assure that \(A\) is a direct sum of \(B\) and \(C\), i.e., \(C=0\) and \(D=0\).
Hwa-Long Gau, Pei Yuan Wu
openaire +1 more source
Let \(A\) be a square matrix partitioned as follows: \[ A = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} B & C \\ D & E \end{array} \right]. \] The authors study several sufficient conditions on \(A\) to assure that \(A\) is a direct sum of \(B\) and \(C\), i.e., \(C=0\) and \(D=0\).
Hwa-Long Gau, Pei Yuan Wu
openaire +1 more source
A note on direct sums of Friedbergnumberings
Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1989We show that a translator ƒ: ω → ω from a Gödelnumbering φ into a direct sum η of a r.e. family of Friedbergnumberings satisfies ƒ ≰T0′. In particular, η cannot be a Gödelnumbering.In the following we use standard notation (cf.[3]): for i ≥ 1, Pi (respectively, Ri) is the set of partial (total) recursive i-place functions; φ is a Gödel numbering of P1.
openaire +3 more sources
On a direct sum of irreducible groups
Mathematical Notes, 2015zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +1 more source
DIRECT SUMS OF OPERATOR SPACES
Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 2001It is proved that if X and Y are operator spaces such that every completely bounded operator from X into Y is completely compact and Z is a completely complemented subspace of X [oplus ] Y, then there exists a completely bounded automorphism τ: X [oplus ] Y → X [oplus ] Y with completely bounded inverse such that τZ = X0 [oplus ] Y0, where ...
openaire +1 more source
Direct Sums and Direct Products
2015The concept of direct sum is of utmost importance for the theory. This is mostly due to two facts: first, if we succeed in decomposing a group into a direct sum, then it can be studied by investigating the summands separately, which are, in numerous cases, simpler to deal with.
openaire +1 more source
Communications in Algebra, 1974
It is a well-known result that the direct sum of any family of injective modules over a Noetherian ring is injective. Conversely, if A is a ring with the property that the direct sum of any family of injective modules is injective H. Bass [1] has shown that A is Noetherian.
B. Sarath, K. Varadarajan
openaire +1 more source
It is a well-known result that the direct sum of any family of injective modules over a Noetherian ring is injective. Conversely, if A is a ring with the property that the direct sum of any family of injective modules is injective H. Bass [1] has shown that A is Noetherian.
B. Sarath, K. Varadarajan
openaire +1 more source

