Results 171 to 180 of about 1,145,906 (216)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns
Financial analysts journal, 2019Using environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings from seven different data providers for a sample of firms in the S&P 500 Index between 2010 and 2017, we studied the relationship between ESG rating disagreement and stock returns.
R. Gibson Brandon +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
2012
This chapter focuses on the rational and universalistic notion of metaphysical truth, which according to the authors' understandings of Maimonides and Jewish theology precludes accepting religious pluralism. Raphael Jospe's position consists of two claims: first, one can be a theological relativist (that is, a religious pluralist) without being an ...
Jolene S. Kellner, Menachem Kellner
openaire +1 more source
This chapter focuses on the rational and universalistic notion of metaphysical truth, which according to the authors' understandings of Maimonides and Jewish theology precludes accepting religious pluralism. Raphael Jospe's position consists of two claims: first, one can be a theological relativist (that is, a religious pluralist) without being an ...
Jolene S. Kellner, Menachem Kellner
openaire +1 more source
Erkenntnis, 2013
This special issue of Erkenntnis is devoted to the varieties of disagreement that arise in different areas of discourse, and the consequences we should draw from these disagreements, either concerning the subject matter and its objectivity, or concerning our own views about this subject matter if we learn, for example, that an epistemic peer disagrees ...
Cohnitz, Daniel, Marques, Teresa
openaire +1 more source
This special issue of Erkenntnis is devoted to the varieties of disagreement that arise in different areas of discourse, and the consequences we should draw from these disagreements, either concerning the subject matter and its objectivity, or concerning our own views about this subject matter if we learn, for example, that an epistemic peer disagrees ...
Cohnitz, Daniel, Marques, Teresa
openaire +1 more source
The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement
Contemporary Epistemology, 2019Looking back on it, it seems almost incredible that so many equally educated, equally sincere compatriots and contemporaries, all drawing from the same limited stock of evidence, should have reached so many totally different conclusions—and always with ...
T. Kelly
semanticscholar +1 more source
Social Science Research Network, 2020
We provide plausibly identified evidence for the role of investor disagreement in asset pricing. Our natural experiment exploits the staggered implementation of EDGAR, which induces a reduction in investor disagreement with no accompanying changes in ...
Yen-Cheng Chang +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
We provide plausibly identified evidence for the role of investor disagreement in asset pricing. Our natural experiment exploits the staggered implementation of EDGAR, which induces a reduction in investor disagreement with no accompanying changes in ...
Yen-Cheng Chang +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology, 2020
: This chapter brings together debates in political philosophy and epistemology over what we should do when we disagree. While it might be tempting to think that we can apply one debate to the other, there are significant differences that may threaten ...
Elizabeth Edenberg
semanticscholar +1 more source
: This chapter brings together debates in political philosophy and epistemology over what we should do when we disagree. While it might be tempting to think that we can apply one debate to the other, there are significant differences that may threaten ...
Elizabeth Edenberg
semanticscholar +1 more source
Metaphilosophy, 2017
AbstractA commonly neglected feature of the so‐calledEqual Weight View, according to which we should give our peers’ opinions the same weight we give our own, is its prima facie incompatibility with the common picture of philosophy as an armchair activity: an intellectual effort to seek a priori knowledge.
openaire +2 more sources
AbstractA commonly neglected feature of the so‐calledEqual Weight View, according to which we should give our peers’ opinions the same weight we give our own, is its prima facie incompatibility with the common picture of philosophy as an armchair activity: an intellectual effort to seek a priori knowledge.
openaire +2 more sources
2023
Abstract One common argument for moral skepticism appeals to the prevalence of moral disagreement. It holds that the best explanation for the widespread disagreement about moral facts is that there simply are no such facts, so there is nothing to constrain our beliefs.
openaire +2 more sources
Abstract One common argument for moral skepticism appeals to the prevalence of moral disagreement. It holds that the best explanation for the widespread disagreement about moral facts is that there simply are no such facts, so there is nothing to constrain our beliefs.
openaire +2 more sources
Epistemic Disagreement and Practical Disagreement
Erkenntnis, 2013It is often thought that the correct metaphysics and epistemology of reasons will be broadly unified across different kinds of reason: reasons for belief, and reasons for action. This approach is sometimes thought to be undermined by the contrasting natures of belief and of action: whereas belief appears to have the ‘constitutive aim’ of truth (or ...
openaire +1 more source
Understanding Expert Disagreement in Medical Data Analysis through Structured Adjudication
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact., 2019Expert disagreement is pervasive in clinical decision making and collective adjudication is a useful approach for resolving divergent assessments. Prior work shows that expert disagreement can arise due to diverse factors including expert background, the
M. Schaekermann +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source