Results 241 to 250 of about 70,982 (295)

Convergent and discriminant validity of the WIST

Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1983
Tested the ability of the Whitaker Index of Schizophrenic Thinking (WIST): (1) to distinguish schizophrenics from nonschizophrenics (N = 30); (2) to agree with clinically rated severity of thought disorder; and (3) to correlate with a measure of generalized cognitive deficit.
W R, Lovallo, R A, Sengel, W R, Leber, B, Shaffer, V, Pishkin   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Convergent and Discriminant Validities of Acquiescence Measures

The Journal of General Psychology, 1965
(1965). Convergent and Discriminant Validities of Acquiescence Measures. The Journal of General Psychology: Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 93-104.
R P, QUINN, E, LICHTENSTEIN
openaire   +2 more sources

Discriminant validity of the MASQ in a clinical sample

Psychiatry Research, 2007
A major weakness of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ) is that its discriminant validity has not been demonstrated in a clinical population of anxiety and mood disorder patients. This paper, using 470 anxiety and mood disorder patients, assessed the discriminant validity of the MASQ.
Boschen, MJ, Oei, TPS
openaire   +5 more sources

The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Chapman Scales

Journal of Personality Assessment, 1993
Our study investigated the convergent and discriminant validity of five of Chapman's Schizotypia Scales (i.e., Physical Anhedonia, Revised Social Anhedonia, Perceptual Aberration, Magical Ideation, and Impulsive Nonconformity; L.J. Chapman, J.P. Chapman, & Raulin 1976, 1978; Eckblad & L.J.
B, Bailey, K Y, West, T A, Widiger, K, Freiman   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Discriminant Validity of the Inventory to Diagnose Depression

Journal of Personality Assessment, 1993
Measures of depression and anxiety correlate highly with one another. It has been hypothesized that this shared variance partly reflects poor discriminant validity, which could be improved by linking item content more closely to diagnostic criteria.
D A, Haaga, W, McDermut, A H, Ahrens
openaire   +2 more sources

Discriminant Validity of the Adult Attachment Interview

Child Development, 1996
The Adult Attachment Interview is a semi-structured interview developed to investigate adults' attachment representations. Subjects are asked to describe their parents as caregivers, explain these descriptions, describe how their parents typically responded to distress, and discuss their current relationships with their parents.
J A, Crowell, E, Waters, D, Treboux, E O, O'Connor, C, Colon-Downs, O, Feider, B, Golby, , Posada   +7 more
openaire   +2 more sources

The discriminant validity of the Eating Disorder Inventory‐2

British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1997
The scores of 78 bulimia nervosa (BN) patients and 67 general psychiatric outpatients on the Revised Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI‐2) were compared in a multivariate discriminant analysis. The bulimia scale was found to correctly classify 97 per cent of all cases.
Schoemaker, C., Verbraak, M., Breteler, M.H.M., Staak, C. van der   +3 more
openaire   +4 more sources

ENRICH MARITAL INVENTORY: A DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY AND CROSS‐VALIDATION ASSESSMENT

Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1989
To assess the validity and clinical utility of the marital inventory ENRICH, a discriminant validity study was conducted using a national sample of 5039 married couples. The sample was randomly split in order to form a cross‐validation group. ENRICH is a multidimensional scale and two types of analysis were conducted to assess the value of these ...
B J, Fowers, D H, Olson
openaire   +2 more sources

Discriminant validity of the Crown–Crisp Experiential Index

British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1987
The discriminative power of the CCEI subscales was examined. Several approaches were undertaken on the responses from subjects in three neurotically disturbed groups and a normal control group. Analyses indicated that simple cut‐off points could discriminate effectively an ‘adjusted‐neurotic’ dimension; simple cut‐off points were relatively more ...
Burgess, P. M., Mazzocco, L., Campbell, I. M.   +2 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Which Should it Be Called: Convergent Validity or Discriminant Validity?

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
(2000). Which Should it Be Called: Convergent Validity or Discriminant Validity? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport: Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 190-194.
openaire   +2 more sources