Results 121 to 130 of about 180 (163)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Foreknowledge & Divine Emotions

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2022
In this essay, we move to further advance the work done on God and emotions by RT Mullins, exploring the role exhaustive divine foreknowledge plays as it relates to God’s emotional life. Given our preliminary investigation at the intersection of divine foreknowledge and divine emotion, and focusing specifically on the neoclassical theistic conception ...
Michael DeVito, Tyler McNabb
openaire   +1 more source

Why divine foreknowledge?

Religious Studies, 2000
Christian theism has traditionally claimed that God knows the future. But why is divine foreknowledge important? In this essay, I argue that divine foreknowledge is valuable to Christian theism and that a hefty theological price must be paid if it is rejected. I also attempt to show that the range of knowledge available to God in theological models
openaire   +1 more source

Divine Foreknowledge and Facts

Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1974
In “Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom” [6] Anthony Kenny returns to a ‘very old difficulty’ stated by Aquinas at Summa Theologiae Ia, 14, 3, 3. Kenny rejects the Thomistic strategy of treating God as an atemporal knower, Who grasps all events of history simultaneously in a timeless present. He takes this notion to be neither Biblical nor coherent.
openaire   +1 more source

Divine foreknowledge and Newcomb's paradox

Philosophia, 1987
Newcomb's Paradox thus serves as an illustrative vindication of the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom. A proper understanding of the counterfactual conditionals involved enables us to see that the pastness of God's knowledge serves neither to make God's beliefs counterfactually closed nor to rob us of genuine freedom.
openaire   +1 more source

Divine Foreknowledge and Fatalism

1997
Abstract It is argued that the compatibility between divine foreknowledge and human libertarian freedom cannot be satisfactorily defended by an appeal to the ’hard fact’–'soft fact’ distinction. The fact that God's foreknowledge is incompatible with human indeterministic freedom does not logical determinism or fatalism.
openaire   +1 more source

Divine foreknowledge, evidence and epistemic responsibility

Theoria
AbstractIn several recent publications, John Martin Fischer proposed a new solution to the problem of divine foreknowledge, which he dubbed the bootstrapping view. On this view, God can have limited knowledge of contingent future based on a combination of (a) God's knowledge of inconclusive evidence about the contingent world available to humans and (b)
Marcin Iwanicki, Anna Maria Karczewska
openaire   +1 more source

Contra Tooley: divine foreknowledge is possible

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2019
Michael Tooley’s latest argument against the possibility of divine foreknowledge trades on the idea that, whichever theory of time is true, the ontology of the future—or lack thereof—gives rise to special problems for God’s prescience. I argue that Tooley’s reasoning is predicated on two mischaracterizations and conclude that, on at least some theories
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy