Results 61 to 70 of about 8,924 (206)

The Racialisation of Rape: A Far‐Right Tool for Boundary‐Creation Across Borders

open access: yesNations and Nationalism, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Far‐right parties and movements have increasingly come to incorporate ideas of gender equality into their political agendas. While seemingly out of concern for women's rights and safety, these issues are in reality seldom more than a veil to further the stigmatisation of Muslim men.
Mathilda Åkerlund
wiley   +1 more source

Nativism, Sons of the Soil and Autochthony: On Internal Migration and the Politics of Belonging

open access: yesNations and Nationalism, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT There is a longstanding and global history of fierce opposition to internal migration across regions. Yet despite the salience of this issue, there is a relative dearth of scholarship on the politics around domestic population movements. This paper critically engages three interrelated concepts in conversation: nativism, sons of the soil and ...
Isabelle Côté   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Strategies for Public Administration Research: Insights From the Scholarship of Christopher Hood

open access: yesPublic Administration, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT In an era of time constraints and publication pressures, scholars risk becoming entrenched in familiar approaches. Christopher Hood's public administration scholarship reminds us that excellence often arises from a broad exploration of ideas. This paper identifies three core elements of Hood's research practice. First, a deep skepticism toward
Ruth Dixon   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Dogmatism and Conventionality

open access: yes, 1982
The scores of 68 undergraduates on Rokeach's Dogmatism Scale correlated significantly with their responses to a conventionality measure, as dogmatism theory would predict.
David Raden
core   +1 more source

Indoctrination and Democratic Legitimacy

open access: yesPhilosophy &Public Affairs, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT I argue that indoctrination undermines voter competence, and that widespread indoctrination thereby compromises the legitimacy of otherwise free and fair elections. Drawing on recent work in virtue epistemology, I provide an epistemic account of indoctrination according to which one is indoctrinated only if they hold an epistemically impactful
James H. McIntyre
wiley   +1 more source

Geneza unui clişeu: „călinescianismul” [PDF]

open access: yesRevista de Istorie și Teorie Literară, 2009
In 1965, immediately after the death of Călinescu (and Gheorghe Gh. Dej also), the literary critics began to use his legacy. In “Contemporanul” Revue, Adrian Marino noticed that the Master wanted his disciples to follow his spirit, not his style.
Andrei Terian
doaj  

Dogmatism and Easy Knowledge: Avoiding the Dialectic?

open access: yesAnalytic Philosophy, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT This paper analyzes and objects to the anti‐skeptical strategy endorsed by Epistemological Dogmatism. Dogmatism is a theory of epistemic justification that holds perceptual warrant for our beliefs is immediate, based on experiential seemings. Crucially, it rejects requests for higher‐order justification or active defense of the justification ...
Guido Tana
wiley   +1 more source

The Dogmatism Puzzle Undone [PDF]

open access: yes
According to the dogmatism puzzle, for any S and any p, if S knows that p, then she’s entitled to be dogmatic about p, and so disregard any evidence against p, for she knows that (or is in a position to know that) that evidence is misleading.
Simpson, James
core   +3 more sources

Modelul şi oglinda. E. Lovinescu „par lui même” [PDF]

open access: yesRevista de Istorie și Teorie Literară, 2012
E. Lovinescu received his due acknowledgment as the main representative of the Romanian inter-bellum culture. His aesthetic criticism pleaded for the necessary modernization of our literature, by means of imitating salient Western models.
Antonio Patraș
doaj  

Fallibility and Dogmatism

open access: yesAustralasian Journal of Philosophy
The strongest version of the dogmatism puzzle argues that, when we know something, we should resolve to ignore or avoid evidence against it. The best existing responses are fallibilist, and hold that decisions should be governed by underlying probabilities rather than our knowledge. I argue that this is an overreaction: by paying close attention to the
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy