Results 101 to 110 of about 11,179 (160)
A minimal physiological model of perceptual suppression and breakthrough in visual rivalry. [PDF]
Whyte CJ, Wilson HR, Shine JM, Alais D.
europepmc +1 more source
Interocular symmetry and asymmetry in ocular health and disease. [PDF]
Cui H, Zhang Z.
europepmc +1 more source
Evaluating the effects of trifocals and extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation on stereopsis and contrast sensitivity in cataract patients. [PDF]
Pradeep BV +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
OCULAR DOMINANCE AND AMBLYOPIA
Optometry and Vision Science, 1975ABSTRACT Occular dominance, as measured in sighting tests involves a temporary suppression of the input from the non‐dominant eye in order to avoid diplopia. Amblyopia ex anopsia may be viewed as a long term suppression of the input from one eye for the same reason. In the absence of amisometropia.
S, Coren, R H, Duckman
openaire +2 more sources
A role for ocular dominance in binocular integration
Current Biology, 2023Neurons in the primate primary visual cortex (V1) combine left- and right-eye information to form a binocular output. Controversy surrounds whether ocular dominance, the preference of these neurons for one eye over the other, is functionally relevant. Here, we demonstrate that ocular dominance impacts gain control during binocular combination.
Blake A. Mitchell +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Ocular dominance columns in strabismus
Visual Neuroscience, 2006During development, the projection from the lateral geniculate nucleus to striate cortex becomes segregated into monocular regions called ocular dominance columns. Prior studies in cats have suggested that experimental strabismus or alternating monocular occlusion increases the width and segregation of columns.
Adams, Daniel Lewis, J. HORTON
openaire +3 more sources
Ocular Dominance and Perceptual Asymmetry
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967Two experiments were performed to determine the relation of sighting and acuity dominance to tachistoscopic recognition. In both, single-letter material was exposed binocularly to either the left or right of fixation at brief durations. In Exp. I ( N = 32) visual field differences in recognition were unrelated to sighting dominance. The results of Exp.
T, Hayashi, M P, Bryden
openaire +2 more sources

