Results 251 to 260 of about 3,153 (290)
The double object constructions in Archaic Chinese*
This article demonstrates that double object constructions in Archaic Chinese display both patterns of direct and indirect object marking (DO+IO) and primary and secondary object marking (PO+SO). We propose two constraints to account for the grammatical distribution of GIVE verbs in the double object construction with PO+SO marking in Archaic Chinese.
Chiew Pheng PHUA, PHUA Chiew Pheng
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Double‐Object Constructions in Syrian Arabic
Syntax, 2018AbstractThis article documents double‐object constructions in contemporary Syrian Arabic and presents an analysis of the case‐frame alternations found there. Some double‐object verbs assign accusative case to their indirect object, as in English, while others assign it dative, as in German. Yet, for both verb types, the double‐object frame productively
Peter Hallman
exaly +2 more sources
Ormazabal and Romero (2012) take issue with the arguments in Bruening 2010b that certain instances of prepositional dative constructions are really double object constructions.
Benjamin Bruening, Bruening Benjamin
exaly +2 more sources
The Double Object Construction
1995Abstract One construction where we might expect, and do find effects of presence or absence of m-case is the double object construction. (7.1) a. John gave Mary a book. We will reserve the term ‘double object construction ‘, abbreviated DOC, specifically for this type of construction: a triadic verb followed by two DPs where the first ...
Anders Holmberg, Christer Platzack
openaire +1 more source
Syntactic Neutralization in Double Object Constructions
Linguistic Inquiry, 2015This article synthesizes the ‘‘alternative projection’’ view of the alternation between the DP + DP and DP + PP complement frames of English double object verbs, according to which the alternants are basegenerated as such, with a transformational account that claims that the DP + PP frame may be derived from the DP + DP frame.
openaire +2 more sources
On the Double Object Construction and the Oblique Construction in Cantonese
Studies in Language, 1997The double-object construction has always been a controversial issue in linguistic theory. In Chinese we encounter an interesting and peculiar situation: both Mandarin and Cantonese have the dative construction with the indirect object (IO) introduced by a dative preposition (V + DO + Prep. + IO), but when the preposition is absent, the indirect object
Xu Liejiong, Alain Peyraube
openaire +1 more source
On the Emergence of the Inverted Double Object Construction in Hakka
Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2020透過歷時和跨方言的語料檢視,本文旨在探討客家話倒置雙賓式的起源。巴色會文獻中的「俾/畀/奔」之用法顯現了單及物持拿義動詞的特點,本文由此出發,提出幾項證據,證明倒置雙賓式源自於介賓補語式的介詞省略,省略的動因是構式義和介詞義之間的語意冗餘,而非如文獻中所言,肇因於同音刪略或因介賓補語式高頻使用而刪略,此外,為促使此結構的產生,此結構中的動詞之類型頻率必須維持在低頻,以便達到較高的語意連貫性,這個觀點可以解釋為何出現在倒置雙賓式中的動詞普遍來說都遠不如介賓補語式來得豐富和多樣。
openaire +1 more source
2000
Abstract In chapter 7 and chapter 8, through studying phenomena not directly connected to GP-splitting, I will explore some of the consequences of the theory of multiple feature checking advocated in this book. In this chapter I will try to investigate the structure of the so-called double object construction (DOC) under the Agrless ...
openaire +1 more source
Abstract In chapter 7 and chapter 8, through studying phenomena not directly connected to GP-splitting, I will explore some of the consequences of the theory of multiple feature checking advocated in this book. In this chapter I will try to investigate the structure of the so-called double object construction (DOC) under the Agrless ...
openaire +1 more source

