Results 51 to 60 of about 779,678 (178)
Does reflection reduce the epistemic side‐effect effect? A new challenge to error accounts
The epistemic side‐effect effect consists of an asymmetric pattern of knowledge attributions in harm and help cases, paralleling the Knobe effect for intentionality attributions. Error‐based accounts suggest the asymmetries arise from performance errors in harm cases. We challenge this claim with three new experimental studies designed to reduce errors.
Bartosz Maćkiewicz +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Awareness and equilibrium [PDF]
There has been a recent surge of interest among economists in developing models of doxastic states that can account for some aspects of human cognitive limitations that are ignored by standard formal models, such as awareness.
Hill, Brian
core
Bayesianism for Non-ideal Agents [PDF]
Orthodox Bayesianism is a highly idealized theory of how we ought to live our epistemic lives. One of the most widely discussed idealizations is that of logical omniscience: the assumption that an agent’s degrees of belief must be probabilistically ...
Bjerring, Jens Christian +1 more
core
Explain Yourself: The Ethics of Soliciting Advice
Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
Jordan Desmond
wiley +1 more source
Hybrid Deference, Hybrid Chance
ABSTRACT If you learn about one kind of chance and nothing else, then you should defer to those chances. But what if you learn about more than one kind of chance? In such “hybrid” cases, familiar chance‐credence principles, like the Principal Principle, go silent when they should intuitively speak.
Alexander Meehan
wiley +1 more source
Two types of epistemic instrumentalism [PDF]
Epistemic instrumentalism views epistemic norms and epistemic normativity as essentially involving the instrumental relation between means and ends. It construes notions like epistemic normativity, norms, and rationality, as forms of instrumental or ...
Côté-Bouchard, Charles
core
ABSTRACT This conceptual essay, grounded in a close reading of Plato's Theaetetus, argues that before educators can effectively operationalise critical thinking as the rigorous evaluation ('stress‐testing') of competing knowledge claims, university students must first understand foundational epistemological principles rooted in Plato's tripartite ...
Gerry Dunne
wiley +1 more source
Lessons for Religious Dialogue from a Philosophical Disagreement: Alston and Schellenberg on Religious Commitment [PDF]
A disagreement between two philosophers, William Alston and J. L. Schellenberg, on the matter of religious commitment serves to exemplify an important difference between religious believers and religious sceptics.
Dastmalchian, Amir
core
Abstract A new argument is offered which proceeds through epistemic possibility (for all S knows, p), cutting a trail from modality to Millianism, the controversial thesis that the semantic content of a proper name is simply its bearer. New definitions are provided for various epistemic modal notions.
Nathan Salmón
wiley +1 more source
Sleeping Beauty and the demands of non‐ideal rationality
Abstract If an agent can't live up to the demands of ideal rationality, fallback norms come into play that take into account the agent's limitations. A familiar human limitation is our tendency to lose information. How should we compensate for this tendency?
Wolfgang Schwarz
wiley +1 more source

