Results 71 to 80 of about 779,678 (178)
Probabilistic coherence, logical consistency, and Bayesian learning: Neural language models as epistemic agents. [PDF]
PLoS One, 2023 Betz G, Richardson K.
europepmc +1 more source
, 2019 This article argues that there can be epistemic dilemmas: situations in which one faces conflicting epistemic requirements with the result that whatever one does, one is doomed to do wrong from the epistemic point of view.
Hughes, Nick
core
Incoherence and the balance of evidential reasons. [PDF]
Asian J Philos, 2023 Schmidt S.
europepmc +1 more source
Atheism and Agatheism in the Global Ethical Discourse: Reply to Millican and Thornhill-Miller [PDF]
, 2015 Peter Millican and Branden Thornhill-Miller have recently argued that contradictions between different religious belief systems, in conjunction with the host of defeaters based on empirical research concerning alleged sources of ...
Salamon, Janusz
core
Religious Pluralism and the Buridan's Ass Paradox [PDF]
, 2009 The paradox of ’Buridan’s ass’ involves an animal facing two equally adequate and attractive alternatives, such as would happen were a hungry ass to confront two bales of hay that are equal in all respects relevant to the ass’s hunger. Of course, the ass
Kvanvig, Jonathan L.
core +2 more sources
Resolving Religious Disagreements [PDF]
, 2018 Resolving religious disagreements is difficult, for beliefs about religion tend to come with strong biases against other views and the people who hold them. Evidence can help, but there is no agreed-upon policy for weighting it, and moreover bias affects
Dormandy, Katherine
core +2 more sources
This thesis is concerned with two key ideas. The first is doxastic wrongdoing, the idea that doxastic attitude could, in and of itself, constitute a wrong. The second is interpersonal rationality. A distinct sense of rationality applicable to both actions and beliefs that is to be contrasted against epistemic rationality.
openaire +3 more sources
Deep Disagreement (Part 2): Epistemology of Deep Disagreement. [PDF]
Philos Compass, 2022 Ranalli C, Lagewaard T.
europepmc +1 more source
Reasons to Not Believe (and Reasons to Act) [PDF]
, 2016 In “Reasons to Believe and Reasons to Act,” Stewart Cohen argues that balance of reasons accounts of rational action get the wrong results when applied to doxastic attitudes, and that there are therefore important differences between reasons to believe ...
Roeber, Blake
core