Results 191 to 200 of about 19,992 (204)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in pseudoexfoliation syndrome

Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2010
AbstractPurpose:  To evaluate differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT) and Dynamic Controur Tonometry (DCT) in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX).Methods:  Thirty‐eight patients (38 eyes) with PEX in both eyes (pseudoexfoliative group, PG) as well as 19 patients (19 eyes) without PEX in either eye (control group, CG), were ...
Emilia, Grammenandi   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry following penetrating keratoplasty

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010
To evaluate dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in eyes that underwent penetrating keratoplasty PKP). Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study.Thirty-one eyes of 28 patients were examined after PKP.All eyes had undergone PKP with interrupted sutures.
Artemios, Kandarakis   +5 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Dynamic Contour Tonometry for Post-LASIK Intraocular Pressure Measurements

Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, 2004
Standard applanation tonometers are subject to systematic errors when applied to corneas with non-standard properties. Dynamic contour tonometry has been proposed as an alternative method for obtaining correct IOP data from such corneas. We have examined its applicability for patients who have undergone LASIK surgery.20 healthy individuals scheduled ...
I, Duba, A C, Wirthlin
openaire   +2 more sources

Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in African American Subjects

Ophthalmology, 2007
To evaluate the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in African Americans and to assess whether these measures were influenced by ocular parameters including corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length.Observational clinical study.The
Felipe A, Medeiros   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

[Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2009
The gold standard for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) until now has been Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), which depends on the central corneal thickness (CCT) and curvature. In patients with keratoconus who have an abnormal corneal geometry and thickness, measurement of pressure with GAT is often difficult and not very reproducible.
N, Schädle   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

Influence of LASEK on Schiøtz, Goldmann and dynamic contour Tonometry

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2017
M. Sales-Sanz   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Lower ocular pulse amplitude with dynamic contour tonometry is associated with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis.

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology-journal Canadien D Ophtalmologie, 2017
Edsel Ing   +12 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: A comparative study.

Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie, 2016
Asaf Achiron   +8 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Correlation between Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry or Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry

Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, 2015
J. Katsimpris   +5 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy