Results 1 to 10 of about 6,067 (195)
Background: Screw impingement is an infrequently reported sequelae following in situ pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis, but it may result in significant bony and chondrolabral degeneration.
Thomas E. Moran MD +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Comparison of conventional and minimal invasive dynamic hip screw technique [PDF]
Objective: To compare clinical outcome of minimally invasive dynamic hip screw technique with conventional dynamic hip screw technique in terms of incision length, peroperative hemoglobin level drop, need of blood transfusions and fracture union in ...
Waqas Ali +2 more
doaj
Introduction: Lag screw cut-out is a serious complication of dynamic hip screw fixation of trochanteric hip fractures. The lag screw position has been acknowledged as one of the important factors affecting the lag screw cut-out. We propose a modification
Selim Amr +7 more
doaj +1 more source
Comparison of treatment of subtrocentric femoral fractures of type A with condylar dynamic screw and hip dynamic screw in hospitalized patients in Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Yasuj, Iran, 2007- 2016 Background: Treatment of sub trochanteric fractures ...
Hamidreza Mohamadi
doaj
Background Femoral neck fractures have a higher incidence in older people with poor prognosis, inducing serious social problems. Common treatment methods include total hip arthroplasty, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, double-screw fixation, multiple-screw ...
Lanxin Cui +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Background Current surgical interventions for the femoral neck fracture are using either cannulated screws (CCS) or a single large screw at a fixed angle with a side-plate (i.e., a sliding hip screw, AKA dynamic hip screw, DHS).
Jia Li +4 more
doaj +1 more source
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SURGICAL OUTCOMES IN AO-OTA 31-A2 FRACTURES: TWO-HOLE VS. FOUR-HOLE DYNAMIC HIP SCREW [PDF]
Background: The choice of implant for the treatment of multifragmentary pertrochanteric fractures AO-OTA 31-A2 is complex, and the dynamic hip screw (DHS) can be used as a biomechanically safe and cost-effective option.
Mesanovic Edin +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Objective: To evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with stable intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail vs. dynamic hip screw. Methods: Sixty patients with stable intertrochanteric fractures, aged
Anmol Sharma +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Nailing of Intertrochanteric Fractures: Review on Pitfalls and Technical Tips
The authors describe the advantages and drawbacks of nailing over the dynamic hip screw for the fixation of hip fractures. The technical pitfalls of nailing and the tips to avoid failure of fixation in nailing have been discussed.
Oh Jong-Keon, Hwang Jin-Ho, Sahu Dipit
doaj +1 more source
Results of Subtrochanteric Fractures Treated with Dynamic Hip Screw and Dynamic Condylar Screw [PDF]
<b>Objective:</b> To study the results of 48 patients with subtrochanteric fractures of the femur, treated surgically with fixation by dynamic hip screw (DHS) in 25 patients (52%), and by dynamic condylar screw (DCS) in 23 patients (48%), at Al-Razi Orthopaedic Hospital in the period between January 1990 and June 1995. <b>Methods:</
F.G.M. Khallaf +2 more
openaire +1 more source

