Results 261 to 270 of about 110,176 (293)

Epistemically Different Epistemic Peers

Topoi, 2019
For over a decade now epistemologists have been thinking about the peer disagreement problem of whether a person is reasonable in not lowering her confidence in her belief P when she comes to accept that she has an epistemic peer on P who disbelieves P.
Mariangela Zoe Cocchiaro, Bryan Frances
openaire   +1 more source

Epistemic Permissiveness

Contemporary Epistemology, 2019
A rational person doesn't believe just anything. There are limits on what it is rational to believe. How wide are these limits? That's the main question that interests me here. But a secondary question immediately arises: What factors impose these limits?
Roger White
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Epistemic Gradualism Versus Epistemic Absolutism

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2021
AbstractEpistemic absolutism holds that knowledge‐that is ungradable, while epistemic gradualism argues the opposite. This paper purports to remodel the gradualism/absolutism debate. The current model initiated by Stephen Hetherington fails to capture the genuine divergence between the two views, which makes the debate equivocal, and the gradualist ...
openaire   +1 more source

The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice

Essays in Philosophy, 2021
M. Brito
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement

Contemporary Epistemology, 2019
Looking back on it, it seems almost incredible that so many equally educated, equally sincere compatriots and contemporaries, all drawing from the same limited stock of evidence, should have reached so many totally different conclusions—and always with ...
T. Kelly
semanticscholar   +1 more source

AI as an Epistemic Technology

Science and Engineering Ethics, 2023
Ramón Alvarado
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Epistemic Hubris

Social Epistemology
It is common nowadays for laypeople to take public stances on complex issues, such as the effectiveness of a vaccine or the seriousness of anthro- pogenic climate change, without any kind of disciplinary expertise. Yet those who do so act as if they were experts in the field, disseminating their thoughts and sometimes also spreading their advice ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Solidarity

2021
Abstract This chapter contains two more arguments against pessimism about moral testimony. First, it argues that epistemic justice sometimes requires you to accept moral testimony, despite the fact that doing so seems to clash with autonomy. Both good and bad experiences teach a person what matters, and how much things matter.
openaire   +1 more source

Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination

International Organization, 1992
P. Haas
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing

, 2009
Ward E. Jones
semanticscholar   +1 more source