Results 291 to 300 of about 113,243 (341)

Invited commentary: does social concordance matter? [PDF]

BMC Prim Care
Anderson JN.
europepmc   +1 more source

<span>When the Boss Is a Voice: Synthetic Authority and Epistemic Asymmetry in AI-Mediated Management</span>

Jia Zhou
openalex   +1 more source

Decolonising informed consent in global mental health research. [PDF]

PLOS Ment Health
ElChaar S, Oliver E, Brown FL, Roberts B.   +3 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Hybrid Epistemic Authority: A Framework for Understanding Professional Credibility on Digital Platforms

Irina Gewinner
openalex   +1 more source

Digital Activism, Legal Reform, and Islamic Feminist Resistance in Saudi Arabia

Zakarriya J.
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Facing Epistemic Authorities

2021
AbstractDisrespect for the truth, the rise of conspiracy thinking, and a pervasive distrust in experts are widespread features of the post-truth condition in current politics and public opinion. Among the many good explanations of these phenomena there is one that is only rarely discussed: that something is wrong with our deeply entrenched intellectual
openaire   +1 more source

Confabulation and epistemic authority

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2018
AbstractMahr & Csibra (M&C) claim that episodic remembering's autonoetic character serves as an indicator of epistemic authority. This proposal is difficult to reconcile with the existence of confabulation errors – where participants fabricate memories of experiences that never happened to them.
openaire   +2 more sources

Negotiating Epistemic Authority

2017
Why do we trust what other people say, and form beliefs on the basis of their speech? One answer: they are taken to have epistemic authority. Intuitively this means that the other person (or institution, or group) is taken to be authoritative in what they say, at least with respect to a particular domain. Here, we want to claim that there are (at least)
Elin McCready, Grégoire Winterstein
openaire   +1 more source

EPISTEMIC AUTHORITY, EPISTEMIC PREEMPTION, AND THE INTELLECTUAL VIRTUES

Episteme, 2016
ABSTRACTHow does the intellectually virtuous person respond to the beliefs of those whom they judge to be their epistemic superiors? Linda Zagzebski argues that we ought to take the beliefs of those we judge to be our epistemic authorities as a preemptive reason to believe the same.
openaire   +1 more source