Results 1 to 10 of about 144,975 (208)
The advantages of neomoorean antiskeptical strategy [PDF]
This paper aims to argue in support of the neo-Moorean attempt(s) to solve a skeptical paradox. It defends the thesis that neo-Mooreans retain advantages and avoid disadvantages of rival anti-skeptical strategies - namely epistemic contextualism.
Mijić Jelena
doaj +1 more source
Against the anti-closure response to the factivity problem for epistemic contextualism
It appears that there is an inconsistency in combining epistemic contextualism with a plausible closure principle for knowledge and the view that knowledge is factive.
Eric Gilbertson
doaj +1 more source
On the Adequacy of Attitude-Ascriptions
Fregeans and Russellians defend different conceptions on the truth-conditions of reports of attitude ascriptions. Very often, they appeal to our intuitions and to pragmatic aspects to support their view.
Guido Imaguire
doaj +1 more source
My aim in this paper is to motivate and defend a version of epistemic contextualism; a version, that is, of what came to be called attributor or ascriber contextualism. I will begin by outlining, in the first part, what I take to be the basic idea of and
Nikola Kompa
doaj +1 more source
Un desafío al contextualismo epistémico
An adequate theory of knowledge attribution sentences must face the Cartesian Skeptical Challenge. Epistemic Contextualism offers an attractive solution to the problem. This is considered to be one of its principal virtues. However, as soon as we ask for
Ignacio Vilaró
doaj +1 more source
The Necessity of Interdisciplinary Interaction between Epistemology and History in Examining the Philosophical Bases of Historical Knowledge [PDF]
History as a science has different functions in its individual, social and cultural senses that epistemologically support other paradigms in different fields of the humanities.
Z. Siyamiyan Gorji, S. Moosavi Siyani
doaj +1 more source
On types of coffee. DeRose's contextualism as an anti-sceptical strategy Semantic contextualism is often used in order to offer solutions for problems in other branches of philosophy, including epistemology.
Tomasz Szubart
doaj +1 more source
Epistemic Disagreements: A Solution for Contextualists
My paper aims to account for the possibility of disagreements concerning what we know; for clearly, people disagree about what they know. More precisely, my goal is to explain how a contextualist theory of knowledge attributions can explain the existence
Giovanni Mion
doaj +1 more source
Pragmatics in Epistemology: Analyzing Pragmatic Encroachment vs. Epistemic Purism [PDF]
Epistemological orthodoxy is a purist one in the sense that it permits only truth-related factors to be relevant to whether or not true belief amounts to knowledge. Contrary to this orthodoxy, ‘Pragmatic Encroachment’ argues that embracing fallibilism we
zeinab salari, Ebrahim Azadegan
doaj +1 more source
The present paper aims to revisit the virtues and disadvantages of epistemic conservatism, which claims that it is rational to adhere to a belief until there is evidence to the contrary.
Rodrigo Laera
doaj +1 more source

