Results 221 to 230 of about 73,893 (267)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Psychopathology, 2012
In historical and epistemological terms, psychiatry is a new discipline born during the 19th century. Rooted in both the natural and social sciences, psychiatric objects of inquiry, namely mental symptoms and mental disorders, are hybrid, constituted by the blending of components arising from disparate sources of knowledge ranging from the biological ...
Ivana S, Marková, German E, Berrios
openaire +2 more sources
In historical and epistemological terms, psychiatry is a new discipline born during the 19th century. Rooted in both the natural and social sciences, psychiatric objects of inquiry, namely mental symptoms and mental disorders, are hybrid, constituted by the blending of components arising from disparate sources of knowledge ranging from the biological ...
Ivana S, Marková, German E, Berrios
openaire +2 more sources
Information-based epistemology, ecological epistemology and epistemology naturalized
Synthese, 1987Only a very short time after the formal birth of information theory in 1948 (Wiener, Shannon) its potential value in psychology began to be realized (Miller and Frick, 1949). Quine's influential suggestion (1968) that epistemology be naturalized, i.e., be viewed as a branch of psychology, might have been expected to bring information theory into ...
openaire +1 more source
Current Opinion in Psychology
Salient social identities have long appeared to shape what we believe and know. But do social identities also shape how we know? This essay argues that performances of "lay epistemology" by populist leaders may shape group norms in ways that encourage supporters to orient to their worlds more through intuition and emotion and less through evidence and ...
Dannagal G. Young +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Salient social identities have long appeared to shape what we believe and know. But do social identities also shape how we know? This essay argues that performances of "lay epistemology" by populist leaders may shape group norms in ways that encourage supporters to orient to their worlds more through intuition and emotion and less through evidence and ...
Dannagal G. Young +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Synthese, 1960
A. Church in his justified criticism 1) of A. Koyre’s analysis of antinomies without using the logistic method, and A. N. Prior in his rigorous treatment 2) of the Epimenides paradox, concur in stressing that the point in this paradox is not the supposed emergence of contradictory conclusions but the apparent possibility of settling an epistemological ...
openaire +2 more sources
A. Church in his justified criticism 1) of A. Koyre’s analysis of antinomies without using the logistic method, and A. N. Prior in his rigorous treatment 2) of the Epimenides paradox, concur in stressing that the point in this paradox is not the supposed emergence of contradictory conclusions but the apparent possibility of settling an epistemological ...
openaire +2 more sources
Virtue Epistemology and the Epistemology of Virtue
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2000The ancient Greeks almost universally accepted the thesis that virtues are skills. Skills have an underlying intellectual structure (logos), and having a particular skill entails understanding the relevant logos, possessing a general ability to diagnose and solve problems (phronesis), as well as having appropriate experience.
openaire +1 more source
2017
In Hinge Epistemology, eminent epistemologists investigate Wittgenstein's concept of basic certainty or 'hinge certainty'. The volume begins by examining the salient features of 'hinges': Are they propositions that enjoy a special kind of non-evidential justification?
Coliva A., Moyal-Sharrock D.
openaire +1 more source
In Hinge Epistemology, eminent epistemologists investigate Wittgenstein's concept of basic certainty or 'hinge certainty'. The volume begins by examining the salient features of 'hinges': Are they propositions that enjoy a special kind of non-evidential justification?
Coliva A., Moyal-Sharrock D.
openaire +1 more source
2009
This chapter examines Plato’s views on knowledge. The constant themes in his dialogues are as follows. The first is that knowledge is systematic. Over specific areas, such as mathematics and morality, and even conceivably for reality as a whole, items of knowledge are systematically interconnected, and it is the task of inquiry in those areas to reveal
openaire +1 more source
This chapter examines Plato’s views on knowledge. The constant themes in his dialogues are as follows. The first is that knowledge is systematic. Over specific areas, such as mathematics and morality, and even conceivably for reality as a whole, items of knowledge are systematically interconnected, and it is the task of inquiry in those areas to reveal
openaire +1 more source
The epistemological status of a naturalized epistemology
Inquiry, 1983Philosophically inclined psychologists and psychologically inclined philosophers often hold that the substantive discoveries of psychology can provide an empirical foundation for epistemology. In this paper it is argued that the ambition to found epistemology empirically faces certain unnoticed difficulties.
openaire +1 more source
Synthese, 1999
This paper is an attempt to clarify why Ludwig Boltzmann from about 1895 to 1905 seemed to adopt a series of extreme epistemological positions, ranging from phenomenalism to pragmatism, while emphatically rejecting what he called ‘metaphysics’ (by which he meant all traditional philosophy).
openaire +1 more source
This paper is an attempt to clarify why Ludwig Boltzmann from about 1895 to 1905 seemed to adopt a series of extreme epistemological positions, ranging from phenomenalism to pragmatism, while emphatically rejecting what he called ‘metaphysics’ (by which he meant all traditional philosophy).
openaire +1 more source
Normative epistemology and naturalized epistemology∗
Inquiry, 1988A number of philosophers have argued that a naturalized epistemology cannot be normative, and thus that the norms that govern science cannot themselves be established empirically. Three arguments for this conclusion are here developed and then responded to on behalf of naturalized epistemology. The response is developed in three stages.
openaire +1 more source