Results 301 to 310 of about 129,716 (354)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Normative epistemology and naturalized epistemology∗
Inquiry, 1988A number of philosophers have argued that a naturalized epistemology cannot be normative, and thus that the norms that govern science cannot themselves be established empirically. Three arguments for this conclusion are here developed and then responded to on behalf of naturalized epistemology. The response is developed in three stages.
openaire +1 more source
The Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology
, 2018While applied epistemology has been neglected for much of the twentieth century, it has seen emerging interest in recent years, with key thinkers in the field helping to put it on the philosophical map.
D. Coady, J. Chase
semanticscholar +1 more source
COMMUNICATIONAL EPISTEMOLOGY (III)
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 19613.1 Logical limitations. The completeness and closedness of a theory (or interpretation, thinking pattern, etc.) give a natural boundary to the theory. Completeness and closedness are defined as follows:A theory T is complete if and only if every sentence constructed with the symbolism of T according to the rules for handling it or its negation is in T.
openaire +1 more source
2023
Abstract Chapter 5 explains how human knowledge is possible according to Ockham in a world exclusively made up of individuals. For this, it first describes Ockham’s theory of cognitive acts: intuitive cognitions, abstractive cognitions, connotative conceptual acts (including basic relational concepts), and judgements.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Chapter 5 explains how human knowledge is possible according to Ockham in a world exclusively made up of individuals. For this, it first describes Ockham’s theory of cognitive acts: intuitive cognitions, abstractive cognitions, connotative conceptual acts (including basic relational concepts), and judgements.
openaire +1 more source
Linking Ontology, Epistemology and Research Methodology
, 2020Mukhles M. Al-Ababneh
semanticscholar +1 more source
Symposium: Feminist Epistemology: FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGY*
Metaphilosophy, 1995L'A. defend la legitimite et la necessite d'une epistemologie feministe fondee sur quatre themes: 1) une conception non-individualiste de la connaissance, 2) une attention a la diversite, 3) une critique de l'objectivite comme but de la connaissance scientifique, 4) une definition normative de la connaissance.
openaire +1 more source

