Results 31 to 40 of about 77 (58)

Unified Treatment of EPR and Bell Arguments in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory

, 1998
12 Pages, LaTex, to appear in Found.Phys ...
Redhead, Michael L. G., Wagner, Fabian
openaire   +2 more sources

Bell's - type inequalities revisted: new constraints from objective reality

Momento, 2002
The empirical evidence tends to confirm the quantum - mechanically (QM) predicted violation of Bell's - type inequalities. The latter are widely accepted to be correct representation of the objective reality (OR) underlying EPR's gedankenexperiment ...
Hector A. Múnera
doaj  

The classical boundaries of the EPR argument and quantum ontology

Von Neumann's Hilbert-space formalism of quantum mechanics constitutes a logico-physical theory of observed or measured reality. Imposing the logical constraint of Booleanity, essential for objectively shareable descriptions among observers, reveals the physical meaning of classicality inherently embedded within the formalism itself. Starting from this
openaire   +2 more sources

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

The Relativistic EPR Argument

Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 1997
At first glance, the realist interpretations of quantum mechanics such as Bohm’s offer many advantages over standard interpretations of the theory. In particular, they give a clear, intuitive picture of many potentially paradoxical physical situations, such as the two-slit experiment and the phenomenon of barrier penetration.
Michael Redhead
exaly   +2 more sources

A Phenomenological Analysis of the EPR Argument

1988
A purely philosophical formulation of the EPR argument, in its original form, is presented. The philosophical concepts utilized to develop the reasoning are those of Husserl’s semantics, as delineated in the first Logical Investigation:“Espression and Meaning.
Vincenzo Fano, Fano Vincenzo
exaly   +3 more sources

Reply to “ A critical analysis of N. Bohr's reply to the EPR argument”

Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, 1981
Abstract It is shown that there is no inconsistency with the wave packet reduction in Bohr's reply to the EPR argument, as claimed in a previous letter by Koc.
Jes Madsen
exaly   +2 more sources

A critical analysis of N. Bohr's reply to the EPR argument

Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, 1981
Abstract N. Bohr's counter-argument to EPR assumes that the complementarity principle imposes a limitation on the types of predictions permissible in quantum theory, similar to the limitation imposed on the types of measurements by the Heisenberg uncertainty relation.
exaly   +2 more sources

A critical analysis of N. Bohr's reply to the EPR argument revisited

Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, 1981
Abstract It is shown that Koc's argument does not claim an inconsistency with the wave packet reduction in Bohr's reply to the EPR paper, as claimed by Madsen. Therefore, Madsen's criticism is irrelevant to Koc's argument.
exaly   +2 more sources

A non-completeness argument for quantum mechanics (analysis of the EPR paper)

Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, 1980
Abstract This paper aims at a clarification of the interrelations of the fundamental ideas in the EPR paper [2]. Through a logical analysis of the completeness condition and the physical reality criterion, we show how the premises of the EPR argument are obtained and explicate in what sense the conclusion that quantum mechanics is a non-complete ...
exaly   +2 more sources

EPR argument and the mystery of the reduced Planck's constant

2020 International Teleconference on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument That "Quantum Mechanics is Not a Complete Theory", 2021
Satya Seshavatharam U.V., Lakshminarayana S.   +1 more
exaly   +2 more sources