Results 61 to 70 of about 240 (92)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Un papiro di Eschine con correzioni (P.Oxy. 2404). Considerazioni sull'ekdosis alessandrina
2009In order to acquire an understanding of how the ekdosis of a text was constructed by the Alexandrian philologists, it is essential to keep in mind the common technical and material aspects of book production, designed to improve the new copy that was produced.
openaire +1 more source
2020
In this paper I dwell on some specific features of Socrates’ protreptic activity as outlined in the writings of Xenophon, Aeschines, and Plato. In these three authors, proptreptics is an activity through which Socrates makes his interlocutors better by a synousia, a “being together” that impacts on both their cognitive and emotional backgrounds.
openaire +1 more source
In this paper I dwell on some specific features of Socrates’ protreptic activity as outlined in the writings of Xenophon, Aeschines, and Plato. In these three authors, proptreptics is an activity through which Socrates makes his interlocutors better by a synousia, a “being together” that impacts on both their cognitive and emotional backgrounds.
openaire +1 more source
Le Contre Timarque d'Eschine : prolégomènes à un Art rhétorique ?
Rhetorica - Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 2021exaly
Il parádeigma in Eschine e Demostene
Vichiana : rassegna di studi filologici e storici del mondo classico : XIII, 1, 2011openaire +1 more source
Remarques sur les scholies de Démosthène et d'Eschine du manuscrit de Patmos
Bulletin De Correspondance Hellenique, 1877Othon Riemann
exaly
2016
In 1896 Sudhaus published PHerc. 250 as one of the fragmenta incerta from Philodemus’On rhetoric. Fragment 1 is very lacunose and, although the editor princeps had integrated the upper part thanks to a quotation from Aeschines’ In Timarchum, the lower part of this column remained obscure. I will offer a new reading of this fragment, now assigned to the
openaire +1 more source
In 1896 Sudhaus published PHerc. 250 as one of the fragmenta incerta from Philodemus’On rhetoric. Fragment 1 is very lacunose and, although the editor princeps had integrated the upper part thanks to a quotation from Aeschines’ In Timarchum, the lower part of this column remained obscure. I will offer a new reading of this fragment, now assigned to the
openaire +1 more source